FINDING DORY
(FAMILY/ANIMATION)
2.5 out of 4 stars
Directed by Andrew Stanton, Co-Directed by Angus MacLane
Featuring the Voices of: Ellen DeGeneres, Albert Brooks, Ed O'Neill, Kaitlin Olsen, Hayden Rolence, Ty Burrell, Diane Keaton, Eugene Levy, Sloane Murray, Idris Elba, Dominic West, Sigourney Weaver
Rated PG for mild thematic elements.
103 minutes (including 6-minute short film, Piper)
Verdict: While it fails to add anything terribly worthwhile to its classic predecessor, FINDING DORY is fine, lightweight family fare.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN FINDING DORY IF YOU LIKED:
FINDING NEMO (2003)
MONSTERS UNIVERSITY (2013)
THE GOOD DINOSAUR (2015)
BRAVE (2012)
CARS 2 (2011)
FINDING DORY unfortunately comes from troubled origins. The original FINDING NEMO, released in theaters 13 years ago this month, was Pixar's biggest success up to that point and the highest-grossing animated film of all-time (until SHREK 2 a year later), and on top of that, it won Pixar their first Academy Award for Best Animated Feature (the award category was introduced for the ceremony honoring films released in 2001). A sequel was inevitable, and Disney was eager to get it cooking as early as 2006, but Pixar wasn't moving along without the original's writer/director Andrew Stanton's involvement. Stanton had other aspirations though, which fell apart when his hugely expensive 2012 live-action directorial debut JOHN CARTER became a huge write-off for Walt Disney Studios. Soon after, plans for the FINDING NEMO sequel were announced with Stanton writing and directing. Stanton was probably already mulling around ideas, and he's given conflicting reports about having been against the idea of a sequel while also intending to make the sequel once he'd finished his planned John Carter trilogy, which was then cancelled. Whatever you believe, FINDING DORY is a sort-of cynical business decision that Stanton had to turn to to rehabilitate his career. That doesn't make it bad or good, but it's worth noting.
The notion of whether a sequel is "necessary" or not is strange, since it suggests that the original was necessary. It's entertainment and storytelling; some sequels make more sense to happen than others, but I don't know if any of it's "necessary". In terms of Pixar, there's a strong argument that TOY STORY 2 and 3 are great movies in their own rights and improve upon their predecessors, but the adventures of Woody and Buzz were resolved neatly before the sequel came along to continue the story. Those continuations were improbably organic, but FINDING DORY is a particularly sequelly sequel. It's not that it's especially contrived, just that it feels more like an afterthought than an organic continuation of its predecessor. Pixar's lost some of its luster post-TOY STORY 3 (last summer's INSIDE OUT being a notable exception), but I'm not going to say that their worst is still better than everyone else's best. That's absurd. If CARS 2 is Pixar's worst, DreamWorks' first two Shrek movies and KUNG FU PANDA are better than Pixar's worst. Still, most of Pixar's productions are better than rival animation studio Illumination Entertainment's cheap but hugely successful fare. CARS 2 is maybe about on par with them.
FINDING DORY plays the 'cute card' a lot, frequently flashing back to baby Dory, modified for maximum textbook cuteness; huge eyes that comprise at least 40% of her mass and a small child's voice provided by newcomer Sloane Murray. Dory (voiced as an adult by Ellen DeGeneres), the regal blue tang with short-term memory loss, is having vague recollections of her family, who she'd been searching for before joining the neurotic clownfish Marlin (voiced by Albert Brooks) on their adventure in the first film. Recalling something about "the jewel of Morro Bay, California" where she last saw her parents (voiced by Eugene Levy and Diane Keaton), Dory, Marlin and his son Nemo (voiced by Hayden Rolence) ride the ocean currents to arrive at the Monterey Marine Life Institute, where Dory is separated from Marlin and Nemo. There, Dory is reunited with a childhood friend, a nearsighted whale shark named Destiny (voiced by Kaitlin Olson), and teams up with cranky octopus named Hank (voiced by Ed O'Neill), who's intent on not being released back into the wild, to find her parents in the large park.
It's a bit unfair that the movie is expected to live up to it predecessor, which is a modern classic, but it's the nature of the sequel and it readily makes those comparisons itself. FINDING NEMO is a big marker in the Pixar canon, a point where the studio's animation reached a new level of visual detail that holds ups today more than any prior production, and except for some of the impressive aerial shots of the Marine Life Institute, there's not much that feels new here (while fully acknowledging that no doubt the most minute details have been enhanced greatly to the trained animator's eye). Emotionally, it has some moments, but it usually doesn't hit the marks it seems to be aiming for, and never holds the weight of the original. Emotionally, it's ambitious, but it's undercut by the slightness of it's story and characters. The same characters have brought a lot more before, but Marlin's and Nemo's involvement is obligatory at best, and Dory is tricky. Dory is a comic sidekick character in the original, which usually doesn't translate well into a leading role, as with Mater in CARS 2, but she does have a little more depth than the likes of Mater. She's definitely less funny as the lead role, that being the result of having to carry more emotional baggage, but otherwise, she isn't much changed here. Small but significant moments of the first movie, i.e. "I look at you, and I'm home," or "I have short-term memory loss. It runs in my family, at least I think it does...where are they?", are pushed into the forefront of her character, but it's neither an addition or a subtraction. It just is. Concerns that giving Dory the spotlight would push her into being annoying are assuaged; she's not annoying, but it turns out that she's not that interesting. This is made an even more prominent point as Marlin and Nemo approach their dilemmas with a "What would Dory do?" mantra, which it turns out is just doing things with a lot of heart and less thought.
The cranky octopus Hank is more interesting; in contrast to Nemo's efforts to escape the fish tank in the first movie, Hank is dead set on staying in the aquarium, in defiance of the oft-repeated Marine Life Institute's motto, "Rescue. Rehabilitate. Release." It would have been nice for the character to be a little more fleshed out, but his irritable and neurotic personality is a good foil to Dory in a way similar to Marlin was in the original, but just different enough. Plus, visually, you can't do much better than an octopus, in all their slippery, tentacley glory. FINDING DORY is significantly more broad and cartoonish than FINDING NEMO, exemplified by the character of Hank, who's is depicted as amphibious (he has to carry Dory around in water, but he probably spend more time out of the water than in throughout the movie), and things only get more absurd from there.
It does feel more like a children's film than its predecessor or the rest of Pixar's best; not the obnoxious kind of kids movie like ANGRY BIRDS, but just very simple, lightweight and "cute". I haven't emphasized enough how often the movie goes out of its way to be cute. It also works hard to pull some heartstrings, and it may work for some, but it feels a bit more manipulative than it should and doesn't add up to much. A serious issue that affects the movie as a whole is the feeling that it lacks substance. It's fluff, and it's fine, but you don't feel like a whole lot has happened once all is said and done. It would have worked better as a short film. As it is, it's definitely an improvement on Pixar's last and least successful movie, THE GOOD DINOSAUR, but it also definitely pales in comparison to last summer's INSIDE OUT. Next to other Pixar films, it ranks somewhere around the likes of MONSTERS UNIVERSITY, a pretty average and visually pleasant movie that can't help but remind the viewer of what it isn't.
![]() |
Images via Disney |