Pages

Friday, February 24, 2017

89th Academy Awards Assessment & Predictions



ACADEMY AWARD FOR BEST PICTURE
The award given to the overall best motion picture of the year as voted on by preferential ballot.  Awarded annually since the first Academy Awards held in 1929, it is presented to as many as three of the winning film's credited producers.  There may be as few as 5 or as many as 10 nominees, based on the percentages of nominating votes from the full voting body of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS).
                                                                                              Paramount Pictures
ARRIVAL 
(SCI-FI/MYSTERY-DRAMA) 
1/2
Directed by Denis Villeneuve
Written by Eric Heisserer
Produced by Shawn Levy, Dan Levine, Aaron Ryder & David Linde
Starring: Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, Forest Whitaker, Michael Stuhlbarg, Mark O'Brien, Tzi Ma, Abigail Pniowsky, Julia Scarlett Dan, Jadyn Malone, Frank Schorpion, Lucas Chartier-Dessert, Christian Jadah
Rated PG-13 for brief strong language.
116 minutes
ARRIVAL is tricky to talk substantially about without spoilers.  It's a mind-bender.  Based on Ted Chiang's 1998 short story "Story of Your Life", it follows the story of Louise Banks (Amy Adams), a linguist brought to a military camp in rural Montana where one of 12 alien spacecrafts have touched down across the globe.  Working alongside physicist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner), she is tasked by on-edge government forces to interpret the entirely foreign efforts of communication used by the extra-terrestrial visitors.  However, the clock is ticking on their efforts, while international and political fears created by the alien landing threaten to erupt into war.  The plot and some themes are reminiscent of THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL, but with larger intellectual ambitions.  At first, it seemed like the plot was overdeveloped, but given some time to ponder it, I appreciated its twists a bit more.  During the past few years, there seems to be an annual "intellectual" or "high art" science fiction movie released in the fall, beginning with GRAVITY in 2013, then INTERSTELLAR and THE MARTIAN.  ARRIVAL is the latest in that line.  It's definitely better than INTERSTELLAR, and to a lesser extent, also THE MARTIAN.  In terms of director Denis Villeneuve's career though, 2015's SICARIO was even better.  Although ARRIVAL has a downcast atmosphere, it's soothing, and especially coming out a couple days after the previously unthinkable happened on Election Day, its story about communication and empathy resonates and inspires.

                                                                                               Paramount Pictures
FENCES 
(DRAMA) 
Directed by Denzel Washington
Written by August Wilson
Produced by Todd Black, Scott Rudin & Denzel Washington
Starring: Denzel Washington, Viola Davis, Stephen Henderson, Jovan Adepo, Russell Hornsby, Mykelti Williamson, Saniyya Sidney, Christopher Mele, Leslie Boone, Jason Silvis
Rated PG-13 for thematic elements, language and some suggestive references.
139 minutes
I haven't seen FENCES yet.

                                                                                            Summit Entertainment
HACKSAW RIDGE 
(WAR DRAMA) 
1/2
Directed by Mel Gibson
Written by Robert Schenkkan and Andrew Knight
Produced by Bill Mechanic and David Permut
Starring: Andrew Garfield, Vince Vaughn, Sam Worthington, Luke Bracey, Hugo Weaving, Ryan Corr, Teresa Palmer, Rachel Griffiths, Richard Roxburgh, Luke Pegler, Richard Pyros, Ben Mingay, Firass Dirani, Damien Thomlinson, Matt Nable, Robert Morgan, Nathaniel Buzolic
Rated R for intense prolonged realistically graphic sequences of war violence including grisly bloody images.
139 minutes
Mel Gibson simply is not one for subtlety, so HACKSAW RIDGE is not a subtle film.  It's old-fashioned, beginning with corny scenes of an idyllic, Norman Rockwell-style boyhood playing 'king of the hill' and a cute courtship between young Desmond Doss (Andrew Garfield) and the nurse who becomes his wife (Teresa Palmer), and continuing to an initially cutesy version of basic training where Doss, a Seventh-day Adventist and conscientious objector who's nonetheless intent on serving his country in any way he can without touching a gun.  Mel Gibson is one for graphic, horrifying, flesh-dismantling violence though, so with HACKSAW RIDGE, he has his cake and eats it too, with a real life hero character who is a pacifist in the face of fierce opposition to his convictions at home (a wonderful departure from recent military-themed hits where heroism in war is reduced to killing lots of brown people and being macho and stoic about it) but is then thrust into a battle bloody enough that it earned the nickname "Typhoon of Steel".  Gibson's direction of the Battle of Okinawa, in which Doss saved the lives of dozens of soldiers, including some from the enemy side, is incredibly fierce and wouldn't feel out of place in a horror movie.  It's sort of an anti-war film, but without the will to court controversy by fully confronting the choices and morality of the soldiers who do fight, instead treating them with the typical reverence of a WWII movie, but the story really is about and in honor of Doss.  It's a little rough around the edges, with its nearly 140-minute run time split cleanly into two halves that seem to run separately, and some of it depends on your tolerance for Gibson's corniness, but for the most part, it's very potent.  Gibson's return to directing is long overdue, and with HACKSAW RIDGE, he outdoes everything else he's done behind the camera save APOCALYPTO.

                                                                                                                     CBS Films
HELL OR HIGH WATER 
(DRAMA/WESTERN) 

Directed by David Mackenzie
Written by Taylor Sheridan
Produced by Carla Hacken and Julie Yorn
Starring: Chris Pine, Ben Foster, Jeff Bridges, Gil Birmingham, Marin Ireland, Katy Mixon, Dale Dickey, Kevin Rankin, Melanie Papalia, John Paul Howard, Christopher W. Garcia, Margaret Bowman
Rated R for some strong violence, language throughout and brief sexuality.
102 minutes 
I sort of hoped that HELL OR HIGH WATER might be 2016's SICARIO (both are written by Taylor Sheridan), but it's not.  HELL OR HIGH WATER is solid, but it's not clear to me what made it so special in the eyes of critics that made it one of their chosen darlings, except maybe that it arrived at the end of a summer that by most accounts was underwhelming and looked a lot better in comparison.  Set in West Texas, this neo-western follows two brothers on a bank robbing spree; Toby Howard (Chris Pine), a divorced and unemployed father, and his reckless, ex-con brother Tanner (Ben Foster); on a mission to steal enough money from various branches of the Texas Midlands Bank in order to pay off their late mother's reverse mortgage before the Texas Midlands Bank forecloses on their family ranch.  They're pursued by two Texas Rangers, Marcus Hamilton (Jeff Bridges) and Alberto Parker (Gil Birmingham), and things naturally turn messier for both sides than either had initially hoped or anticipated.  It's solidly made, with good acting, directing and writing, but it also feels very much in the vein of things like Breaking Bad and NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, but without the same potency.

                                                                                                         20th Century Fox
HIDDEN FIGURES 
(DRAMA) 
1/2
Directed by Theodore Melfi
Written by Allison Schroeder & Theodore Melfi
Produced by Donna Gigliotti, Peter Chernin, Jenno Topping, Pharrell Williams and Theodore Melfi
Starring: Taraji P. Henson, Octavia Spencer, Janelle Monae, Kevin Costner, Kirsten Dunst, Jim Parsons, Mahershala Ali, Aldis Hodge, Glen Powell, Kimberly Quinn, Olek Krupa
Rated PG for thematic elements and some language.
127 minutes
HIDDEN FIGURES was a surprise, not necessarily in being nominated for Best Picture, but in that it was actually pretty good.  I mean, it's a PG-rated civil rights history lesson, which is technically a good thing, but also seems a bit like the side of nutritious frozen vegetables that people only eat because they think they should.  But no, it's actually really good, in a not-terribly-subtle, crowd-pleasing way.  The story is a deleted section from the THE RIGHT STUFF story, about the oft-overlooked role of black mathematicians on the U.S. side of the Space Race, mainly the experiences of Space Task Group team member Katherine Goble (Taraji P. Henson), Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) and Mary Jackson (Janelle Monae).  There are some minor "white savior" elements involving Space Task Group director Al Harrison (Kevin Costner) and astronaut John Glenn (Glen Powell) heroically giving these women consideration that should have been expected in the first place, but for the most part, it's reasonably smart and complex in its portrayals of people striving for greatness against prejudices about their skin color and gender.  It's funny and engaging, with excellent acting all around (especially Henson), but also, it's just great to have this story out there in such an accessible way.

                                                                                                  Summit Entertainment
LA LA LAND 
(MUSICAL/ROMANCE) 
★★
Directed by Damien Chazelle
Written by Damien Chazelle
Produced by Fred Berger, Jordan Horowitz and Marc Platt
Starring: Ryan Gosling, Emma Stone, John Legend, Rosemarie DeWitt, Finn Wittrock, Jessica Rothe, Sonoya Mizuno, Callie Hernandez, J.K. Simmons, Tom Everett Scott, Meagan Fay, Damon Gupton, Jason Fuchs, Josh Pence
Rated PG-13 for some language.
128 minutes
The year's faraway favorite, a rare original live-action movie musical (now we're getting another in December 2017), LA LA LAND is a movie that I'd been looking forward to ever since I first heard about it, but now I find my personal feelings about it complicated.  Let's be clear, it's a stellar production, a gorgeous, colorful, soulful and brassy musical with two delightful leads who ooze with chemistry, an ode to Los Angeles, dreams and the choices that make us who we are and the paths that may have been.  LA LA LAND is what people mean when they talk about "movie magic."  It brings up a lot of feelings for me though, and not all of them are ones that I like at the moment.  Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling, who previously romanced in CRAZY STUPID LOVE, star as Mia Dolan and Sebastian Wilder, respectively, a struggling actress and a struggling jazz musician who meet and fall in love but find their relationship complicated by their ambitions.  Nominated in 14 categories, it tied the record for most number of Oscar nominations (TITANIC and ALL ABOUT EVE being the only other movies to have so many) and stands a chance of reaching or surpassing the record of 11 Oscar wins.  It's not terribly likely, but it's possible.

                                                                                                The Weinstein Company
LION 
(DRAMA) 
Directed by Garth Davis
Written by Luke Davies
Produced by Emile Sherman, Iain Canning and Angie Felder
Starring: Dev Patel, Rooney Mara, Nicole Kidman, David Wenham, Abhishek Bharate, Divian Ladwa, Priyanka Bose, Deepti Naval
Rated PG-13 for thematic material and some sensuality.
118 minutes
I have not seen LION.

                                                                                                            Amazon Studios
MANCHESTER BY THE SEA 
(DRAMA) 
1/2
Directed by Kenneth Lonergan
Written by Kenneth Lonergan
Produced by Matt Damon, Kimberly Steward, Chris Moore, Lauren Beck and Kevin J. Walsh
Starring: Casey Affleck, Michelle Williams, Kyle Chandler, Lucas Hedges, Gretchen Mol, C.J. Wilson, Tate Donovan, Kara Hayward, Anna Baryshnikov, Heather Burns, Erica McDermott, Matthew Broderick, Oscar Wahlberg
Rated R for language throughout and some sexual content.
137 minutes
MANCHESTER BY THE SEA is a quiet, comfortable, meandering and human "slice of life" kind of movie full of scenic imagery and rich atmosphere, but the rest of it would only mean so much without Casey Affleck's standout central performance.  The younger Affleck stars as Lee Chandler, a quiet and withdrawn handyman who gets called back to his hometown of Manchester-by-the-Sea when his brother Joe (played by Kyle Chandler in flashbacks) suffers a fatal heart attack, leaving behind a teenage son, Patrick (Lucas Hedges).  As Lee gets to know his nephew again, after having not seen him in years, and works to have the funeral arranged, the events of Lee's past unfold, revealing what led him to choose his life of isolation.  Written and directed by Kenneth Lonergan, with great supporting work by Michelle Williams and Kyle Chandler, it's a low-key but flavorful experience, if only that it runs a bit too long.  Affleck is fantastic though.

                                                                                                                              A24
MOONLIGHT 
(DRAMA) 
1/2
Directed by Barry Jenkins
Written by Barry Jenkins and Tarell Alvin McCraney (story credit only)
Produced by Adele Romanski, Dede Gardner and Jeremy Kleiner
Starring: Trevante Rhodes, Ashton Sanders, Alex Hibbert, Andre Holland, Jharrel Jerome, Jaden Piner, Mahershala Ali, Naomie Harris, Janelle Monae, Patrick Decile
Rated R for some sexuality, drug use, brief violence, and language throughout.
111 minutes
Similarly to HELL OR HIGH WATER, MOONLIGHT is a really solidly-made movie for which the immense critical acclaim is a little odd, because while it's very solid, it's not the knockout that a 98% positive, 9/10 average on Rotten Tomatoes score and placement at the top of dozens of critics' top ten lists seem to suggest.  On the other hand, it is more unique in the type of characters it portrays, being the coming of age story of a gay black man from a rough side of Miami.  Told in three distinct sections, MOONLIGHT is the story of Chiron, played as a child by Alex Hibbert, when he finds a compassionate mentor and protector in a crack dealer named Juan (Mahershala Ali), as a teen by Ashton Sanders, when he experiences his first love and heartbreak with his classmate Kevin (Jharrel Jerome), and as an adult by Trevante Rhodes, a hardened drug dealer who's tried to leave behind his past when he gets a call from Kevin (Andre Holland).  It's achy and compassionate through and through, clearly personal and heartfelt, but in some ways fleeting and withdrawn.  It humanely dismantles ideas about identity and stereotypes with boldness and aplomb, with a standard indie-style handheld, grainy look.  It's great strengths above anything else are its performances, the notable standout being Mahershala Ali, but I'd also give note to Trevante Rhodes.
WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED:
                                                           A24

SWISS ARMY MAN
It wouldn't have much chance of winning, but it deserves to be in the conversation, and the fact that the Academy managed to avoid nominating it in a single category is as absurd as its 'farting corpse' premise.  In any case, it was one of the best and most brilliant movies of 2016.

SILENCE
For one, it's a new movie from Martin Scorsese, which ought to count for a lot, and it's been a passion project of his in development for 26 years.  It's really rich and fascinating, with stellar acting, direction and production, but it's failure to receive much recognition from the Academy is due in part to a bungled roll-out by its distributor, Paramount Pictures.


BEST DIRECTOR 
The award given to a film's director whose work on a given film stands out as most exceptional.  Awarded annually since the first Academy Awards held in 1929, at which time it was divided into two awards for directing in drama and comedy before it was combined into a single award the following year, the 5 nominees are voted for by the directors branch of AMPAS, and voted on by the Academy body as a whole, with a plurality of votes determining the winner.  Given the widely agreed upon integral relationship between the quality of directing and the quality of the film as a whole, the nominating and awarding of Best Director and Best Picture are often closely tied.  The record for most wins in this category is John Ford with 4.  The record for most nominations is William Wyler with 12.  Mel Gibson is the only previous winner of this award among this year's nominees, having won in 1996 for BRAVEHEART, but this is his first nomination since then.  The other four nominees from this year are first-time nominees in this category.
  • ARRIVAL, directed by DENIS VILLENEUVE
  • HACKSAW RIDGE, directed by MEL GIBSON
  • LA LA LAND, directed by DAMIEN CHAZELLE
  • MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, directed by KENNETH LONERGAN
  • MOONLIGHT, directed by BARRY JENKINS
WHO WILL WIN: The money is on Chazelle, who on only his second directorial feature has gone from the blistering ferocity of another AMPAS favorite, WHIPLASH, to a glitzy and glamorous musical ode to their hometown of Los Angeles and movie that has already been shown to have no lack of love from the Academy, considering the record 14 nominations.
WHO SHOULD WIN: Chazelle, who crafted a gorgeous, peppy and fluent classically-styled musical with a modern edge on only his second feature film.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: The dark horse candidate here is Gibson, previously having won the Academy Award for Best Director 21 years ago for BRAVEHEART, and his nomination is the closest thing to a surprise in this category, especially after his 10-year shunning following a well-publicized, suspicion-confirming anti-Semitic rant.  10 years is a long time to pay for a drunken racist rant (horrible though drunken racist rants may be), and assuming he uses it well, I'm glad Gibson has his comeback.  Seriously, he's so likable onscreen and APOCALYPTO is amazing.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: Out of directors from the Best Picture-nominated films, they've already hit the main marks (haven't seen FENCES, so I can't speak to Denzel Washington's direction there), but Martin Scorsese definitely deserves notice for his impressive latest epic, SILENCE, and again to SWISS ARMY MAN, the Daniels, Daniel Scheinert and Daniel Kwan, and in a less traditional direction, Jon Favreau for the impressive technical vision of Disney's THE JUNGLE BOOK remake.
Damien Chazelle (left), writer/director of LA LA LAND, on set with Ryan Gosling  (Summit Entertainment)


BEST ACTOR 
The award given to a male actor whose performance in a leading role in a given film is considered most exceptional by the voting body of the Academy.  Awarded annually since the first Academy Awards in 1929, the 5 nominees are decided by a voting process limited to the actors branch of AMPAS, and the winner is decided by a plurality of votes from the voting body of AMPAS as a whole.  The record for most wins in this category is held by Daniel Day-Lewis with 3.  Of this year's nominees in the category, Denzel Washington is the only previous Oscar-winner, having won the Best Actor award in 2002 for his role in TRAINING DAY.  Viggo Mortensen has been nominated previously in 2008 for EASTERN PROMISES, and Ryan Gosling was nominated in 2007 for HALF NELSON.  Casey Affleck was nominated in 2008 for Best Supporting Actor in THE ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD.
  • CASEY AFFLECK in MANCHESTER BY THE SEA as Lee Chandler 
  • ANDREW GARFIELD in HACKSAW RIDGE as Desmond T. Doss 
  • RYAN GOSLING in LA LA LAND as Sebastian Wilder 
  • VIGGO MORTENSEN in CAPTAIN FANTASTIC as Ben Cash 
  • DENZEL WASHINGTON in FENCES as Troy Maxson 
WHO WILL WIN: Affleck, probably.
WHO SHOULD WIN: I can't speak to Mortensen or Washington, but Casey Affleck is spot-on perfect and fully fleshed out in MANCHESTER BY THE SEA.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: In terms of Garfield, he was good in HACKSAW RIDGE, but the nomination comes in the same year as his superior performance in SILENCE.  The dark horse candidate is Gosling.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: Again, SWISS ARMY MAN, for which Daniel Radcliffe was terrific on multiple levels as the sentient corpse, Manny, and Andrew Garfield as Sebastio Rodrigues for SILENCE.
Casey Affleck in MANCHESTER BY THE SEA  (Amazon Studios)


BEST ACTRESS 
The award given to a female actor whose performance in a leading role in a given film is considered most exceptional by the voting body of the Academy.  Awarded annually since the first Academy Awards in 1929, the 5 nominees are decided by a voting process limited to the actors branch of AMPAS, and the winner is decided by a plurality of votes from the voting body of AMPAS as a whole.  The record for most wins in this category is held by Katherine Hepburn with 4, while a nominee this year, Meryl Streep, holds the record for most nominations at 16, plus 4 in Best Supporting Actress.  Streep has also won Best Actress twice, first for SOPHIE'S CHOICE in 1984 and again in 2012 for THE IRON LADY, and Best Supporting Actress once for KRAMER VS. KRAMER in 1980.  NATALIE PORTMAN has previously won in 2011 for BLACK SWAN.  Emma Stone was previously nominated for Best Supporting Actress in BIRDMAN OR (THE UNEXPECTED VIRTUE OF IGNORANCE).  Isabelle Hupprt and Ruth Negga are both first-time nominees.
  • ISABELLE HUPPERT in ELLE as Michele LeBlanc 
  • RUTH NEGGA in LOVING as Mildred Loving 
  • NATALIE PORTMAN in JACKIE as Jackie Kennedy 
  • EMMA STONE in LA LA LAND as Mia Dolan 
  • MERYL STREEP in FLORENCE FOSTER JENKINS as Florence Foster Jenkins
WHO WILL WIN: Stone.
WHO SHOULD WIN: I can't speak to Portman in JACKIE, Huppert in ELLE, or Streep in FLORENCE FOSTER JENKINS, and Negga was really good, but I like Emma Stone in pretty much everything.  Maybe not BIRDMAN so much, but everything else she's in.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: Amy Adams for both ARRIVAL and NOCTURNAL ANIMALS.  The latter is the more complex performance, but the former is also very good and in a movie I liked much more.  Both are Oscar-worthy.
Emma Stone in LA LA LAND  (Summit Entertainment)


BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR 
The award given to a male actor whose performance in a supporting role in a given film is considered most exceptional by the voting body of the Academy.  Awarded annually since the 9th Academy Awards in 1937, the 5 nominees are decided by a voting process limited to the actors branch of AMPAS, and the winner is decided by a plurality of votes from the voting body of AMPAS as a whole.  The record for most wins in this category is Walter Brennan with 3.  Among this year's nominees, Jeff Bridges has been nominated in this category 3 times previously without any wins but won for Best Actor in 2010 for CRAZY HEART, while Michael Shannon has been nominated before in 2009 for REVOLUTIONARY ROAD.  Mahershala Ali, Lucas Hedges and Dev Patel are each first-time nominees.
  • MAHERSHALA ALI in MOONLIGHT as Juan 
  • JEFF BRIDGES in HELL OR HIGH WATER as Marcus Hamilton 
  • LUCAS HEDGES in MANCHESTER BY THE SEA as Patrick Chandler 
  • DEV PATEL in LION as Saroo Brierly 
  • MICHAEL SHANNON in NOCTURNAL ANIMALS as Detective Bobby Andes
WHO WILL WIN: Ali.
WHO SHOULD WIN: Michael Shannon is great and was an oasis of good humor in the well-made but aggressively unpleasant NOCTURNAL ANIMALS, but Ali is sublime in MOONLIGHT.  In full disclosure, I can't speak to Dev Patel in LION.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: John Goodman for 10 CLOVERFIELD LANE, Trevante Rhodes for MOONLIGHT and Alden Ehrenreich for HAIL, CAESAR!.
Mahershala Ali (left) with Alex R. Hibbert in MOONLIGHT  (A24)


BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS 
The award given to a female actor whose performance in a supporting role in a given film is considered most exceptional by the voting body of the Academy.  Awarded annually since the 9th Academy Awards in 1937, the 5 nominees are decided by a voting process limited to the actors branch of AMPAS, and the winner is decided by a plurality of votes from the voting body of AMPAS as a whole.  The record for most wins in this category is held by Dianne Wiest and Shelley Winters, both with 2.  Among this year's nominees, Octavia Spencer is the only previous winner in this category for THE HELP in 2012, but Nicole Kidman has won for Best Actress in 2003 for THE HOURS.  Viola Davis has been nominated once before in 2009 for DOUBT and for Best Actress in 2012 for THE HELP, and Michelle Williams has been nominated once before in 2006 for BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, as well as twice for Best Actress for BLUE VALENTINE and MY WEEK WITH MARILYN.  Naomie Harris is a first-time nominee.
  • VIOLA DAVIS in FENCES as Rose Maxson 
  • NAOMIE HARRIS in MOONLIGHT as Paula 
  • NICOLE KIDMAN in LION as Sue Brierly 
  • OCTAVIA SPENCER in HIDDEN FIGURES as Dorothy Vaughan 
  • MICHELLE WILLIAMS in MANCHESTER BY THE SEA as Randi
WHO WILL WIN: This one is tricky.  I'm going to guess Viola Davis, who was a favorite to win Best Actress for THE HELP in 2011 but lost to Meryl Streep in THE IRON LADY in an upset, and now has a chance to win in an arguably less competitive category.
WHO SHOULD WIN: No opinion.  Of the nominees, I still haven't seen Davis in FENCES or Kidman in LION, and am not confident enough to say any should win over the other.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: Octavia Spencer, who won in this category for 2011's THE HELP, is good as expected in HIDDEN FIGURES, but if I were to pick out an acting nomination from that movie, I'd go with Taraji P. Henson (although hers would be tough to argue as anything but a leading role).  Kidman has a chance as a dark horse candidate thanks to the Weinstein Company power behind her, but following the #OscarsSoWhite controversy, they have three actresses of color to choose from here and they're unlikely to leave that out of consideration.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: From MOONLIGHT, I'd have gone with Janelle Monae over Harris.
Viola Davis in FENCES  (Paramount Pictures)


BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY 
The award given to the writer of a screenplay, not based upon previously published material, determined most exceptional by the voting body of the Academy.  Awarded annually since the 13th Academy Awards held in 1941, the 5 nominated screenplays are selected by the voting process of the writers branch of AMPAS.  The record for most most wins in this category is Woody Allen with 3.  Damien Chazelle has been nominated once before for WHIPLASH, and Kenneth Lonergan has been nominated twice before for YOU CAN COUNT ON ME and GANGS OF NEW YORK.
  • HELL OR HIGH WATER, written by Taylor Sheridan 
  • LA LA LAND, written by Damien Chazelle 
  • THE LOBSTER, written by Yorgos Lanthimos and Efthimis Filippou 
  • MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, written by Kenneth Lonergan 
  • 20TH CENTURY WOMEN, written by Mike Mills

WHO WILL WIN: Another tricky one, but I'll guess MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, the nominee other than LA LA LAND with nominations in both Best Picture and Best Director.  In this case, I'm betting against LA LA LAND, a movie whose script is good, but doesn't stand out as particularly unique among its acheivements.
WHO SHOULD WIN: MANCHESTER sounds fine to me, but I haven't seen 20TH CENTURY WOMEN, and none of the nominees stands out as especially brilliant.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: I don't care if it's a critical darling; THE LOBSTER is an irritatingly twee indie film with a couple of really promising ideas and a lot of preciousness, and I don't like it.  HELL OR HIGH WATER is my second-place pick to win.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: Again, and here which it deserved most above all, SWISS ARMY MAN, written by Daniel Scheinert and Daniel Kwan, which crafts a hilarious and moving essay exploring and celebrating the crass and divine in the human experience, and where the crass and divine meet, and unravels the nature of shame, intimacy, isolation, depression and hope, complete with extensive fart and boner jokes.  THE WITCH, written by Robert Eggers, is a very sharp, chilling story of 17th century superstition, paranoia, horror and empowerment, and also would be very deserving.
Kenneth Lonergan (left), writer/director of MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, on set with Casey Affleck  (Amazon Studios)




BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY 
The award given to the writer of a screenplay, based upon previously published material, determined most exceptional by the voting body of the Academy.  Awarded annually since the 1st Academy Awards held in 1929, the 5 nominated screenplays are selected by the voting process of the writers branch of AMPAS.  The record for most wins in this category is 2, held between several writers.  All nominees in the category this year are first-time nominees, although the late August Wilson won a Tony and a Pulitzer for his FENCES screenplay in its stage form. 
  • ARRIVAL, written by Eric Heisserer, adapted from "Story of Your Life", a short story by Ted Chiang 
  • FENCES, written by August Wilson, adapted from "Fences", a stage play by August Wilson
  • HIDDEN FIGURES, written by Allison Schroeder and Theodore Melfi, adapted from Hidden Figures: The Story of the African-American Women Who Helped Win the Space Race, a non-fiction novel by Margot Lee Shetterly 
  • LION, written by Luke Davies, adapted from A Long Way Home, a non-fiction novel by Saroo Brierly and Larry Buttrose 
  • MOONLIGHT, written by Barry Jenkins and Tarell Alvin McCraney, adapted from "In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue", an unpublished stage play by Tarell Alvin McCraney 

WHO WILL WIN: MOONLIGHT, which, outside of Mahershala Ali in the Best Supporting Actor category, has its best shot of winning in this category.
WHO SHOULD WIN: I haven't seen FENCES or LION, but from the ones I have seen, ARRIVAL.  It's smart and meaty, and involving.
Barry Jenkins, director and co-writer of MOONLIGHT


BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM 
The award given to a feature-length film, comprised of at least 75% frame-by-frame animation, considered the most exceptional film as a whole.  Awarded annually since the 74th Academy Awards in 2002, the first winner in this category was SHREK.  
  • KUBO AND THE TWO STRINGS, directed by Travis Knight, produced by Travis Knight and Arriane Sutner 
  • MOANA, directed by Ron Clements & John Musker, produced by Osnat Shurer 
  • MY LIFE AS A ZUCCHINI, directed by Claude Barras, produced by Max Karli 
  • THE RED TURTLE, directed by Michael Dudok de Wit, produced by Toshio Suzuki 
  • ZOOTOPIA, directed by Byron Howard & Rich Moore, produced by Clark Spencer

WHO WILL WIN: ZOOTOPIA, the highest-grossing of the bunch, a critical darling, and a clever if thematically inconsistent rebuttal of the Trump era.
WHO SHOULD WIN: I love ZOOTOPIA, but I like MOANA even more.  MOANA is a terrific musical fairy tale, more traditional than ZOOTOPIA, but not in a bad way.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: KUBO AND THE TWO STRINGS is so fantastic up until the near the end, at which point the conclusion didn't make a lot of sense.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: I wonder if THE JUNGLE BOOK qualifies for this category...
                                                                                                                            Disney
BEST ORIGINAL SCORE 
The award given to the body of dramatic underscoring music composed originally for a film and considered most exceptional by the voting body of AMPAS.  Awarded annually since the 7th Academy Awards held in 1935, the award was issued in two subcategories, one for an original score and one for a musical score, from 1939 to 1950, Score for Dramatic or Comedy Picture and Score of a Musical Picture from 1951 to 1970, Original Dramatic Score and Original Song Score and Adaptation from 1971 to 1985, and Original Dramatic Score and Musical or Comedy Score from 1996 to 1999.  The record for most wins is Alfred Newman with 9, while the record for most nominations is John Williams with 50.  Among this year's nominees, only Thomas Newman has been previously nominated, with this year making 14.
  • JACKIE, score by Mica Levi 
  • LA LA LAND, score by Justin Hurwitz 
  • LION, score by Dustin O'Halloran & Hauschka 
  • MOONLIGHT, score by Nicholas Britell 
  • PASSENGERS, score by Thomas Newman

WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND, further padding out its count.
WHO SHOULD WIN: I haven't seen JACKIE or LION, and out of MOONLIGHT and PASSENGERS, I'd definitely go with MOONLIGHT, but neither one particularly stood out to me.  LA LA LAND has the best music of the bunch, but I'm not sure where the line is between 'score' and song music.  Maybe it doesn't matter though.
Justin Hurwitz, score and song composer for LA LA LAND


BEST ORIGINAL SONG 
The award given for an original song considered most exceptional and written specifically to accompany a film, awarded annually since the 7th Academy Awards held in 1935.  
  • "Audition (The Fools Who Dream)" from LA LA LAND, music by Justin Hurwitz, lyrics by Benj Pasek & Justin Paul
  • "Can't Stop the Feeling!" from TROLLS, music & lyrics by Justin Timberlake, Max Martin & Shellback
  • "City of Stars" from LA LA LAND, music by Justin Hurwitz, lyrics by Benj Pasek & Justin Paul
  • "The Empty Chair" from JIM: THE JAMES FOLEY STORY, music & lyrics by J. Ralph & Sting
  • "How Far I'll Go" from MOANA, music & lyrics by Lin-Manuel Miranda
WHO WILL WIN: "Audition (The Fools Who Dream)", pretty much everyone's favorite song from LA LA LAND, although "How Far I'll Go" from MOANA could turn out to be a spoiler in order for AMPAS to give an Oscar to man of the moment Lin-Manuel Miranda.
WHO SHOULD WIN: Personally, I'm a big fan of "How Far I'll Go".
FURTHER ANALYSIS: Best Original Song is a weird category that is sometimes a strain to fill out, and usually, there's an odd nomination from a smaller movie or documentary that uses a pop song in the credits to garner further attention.  I don't know much about "The Empty Chair" or JIM: THE JAMES FOLEY STORY.  Perhaps the most high-profile nominee this year is Justin Timberlake's "Can't Stop the Feeling!" which has been blaring on radio stations since last summer, months before TROLLS hit theaters.  It's like Pharrell Williams's "Happy" from a few years ago (which lost to "Let It Go"), a happy, peppy and shallow pop hit that's a lot better than the stinky piece of crap it was written for.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: This is the rare year that there were actually a lot of really good songs in movies.  Part of that may be because we're a few years out from the FROZEN phenomenon, and we're just now getting the movies started in its immediate aftermath.  I'm surprised that the Shakira-performed "Try Everything" from ZOOTOPIA wasn't nominated, or "You're Welcome" from MOANA, and one of the most overlooked movies of the year, POPSTAR: NEVER STOP NEVER STOPPING had a number of great songs deserving recognition, including "Finest Girl (Bin Laden Song)", "Mona Lisa", "I'm So Humble" and "Equal Rights".  In terms of LA LA LAND, I kind of like "Someone in the Crowd", the exuberant number Mia and her friends sings with the accompaniment of chirping flutes as they go out for a night on the town.
                                                                                                 Summit Entertainment
BEST SOUND EDITING 
The award given for the sound design and especially sound effects considered most exceptional in a film, awarded to the credited supervising sound editors of the film, awarded annually since the 54th Academy Awards held in 1982, and awarded intermittently from 1964-1968, 1976, 1978 and 1980.
  • ARRIVAL, sound editing by Sylvain Bellemare
  • DEEPWATER HORIZON, sound editing by Wylie Stateman & Renee Tondelli
  • HACKSAW RIDGE, sound editing by Robert Mackenzie & Andy Wright
  • LA LA LAND, sound editing by Ai-Ling Lee & Mildred Iatou Morgan
  • SULLY, sound editing by Alan Roberty Murray & Bub Ashman
WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND.  Could go to HACKSAW RIDGE, because there's two sound awards and even the Academy voters have a minimal understanding of the differences, and the war movie has a lot of booming sound.  That said, rewatching LA LA LAND recently, I couldn't help but notice how wonderful all the sounds in it are.


BEST SOUND MIXING 
The award given for the overall sound and sound levels considered most exceptional in a film and awarded to the credited sound mixers and re-recording mixers of the film, awarded annually since the 3rd Academy Awards held in 1930.
  • ARRIVAL, sound mixing by Bernard Gariepy Strobl & Claude La Haye
  • HACKSAW RIDGE, sound mixing by Kevin O'Connell, Andy Wright, Robert Mackenzie & Peter Grace
  • LA LA LAND, sound mixing by Andy Nelson, Ai-Ling Lee & Steve A. Morrow
  • ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY, sound mixing by David Parker, Christopher Scarabosio & Stuart Wilson
  • 13 HOURS: THE SECRET SOLDIERS OF BENGHAZI, sound mixing by Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers, Jeffrey J. Haboush & Mac Ruth
WHO WILL WIN: I'll go with HACKSAW RIDGE on this one, since "sound mixing" has more to do with sound levels and is more prominent in an action movie, however, LA LA LAND could easily snatch this one up too.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: Academy Award-nominee 13 HOURS: THE SECRET SOLDIERS OF BENGHAZI.  It's just one of those ones that sound ridiculous.  That movie was so boring.  It wasn't even inflammatory.  It was just boring.


BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN 
The award given the overall visual appearance and unified vision of a film's art direction considered most exceptional, awarded to the credited art director and the credited set decorator.  It has been awarded annually since the first Academy Awards held in 1929 when it was called 'Best Interior Decoration', then 'Best Art Direction' beginning in 1948 at the 20th Academy Awards, and most recently changed to 'Best Production Design' in 2013 for the 85th Academy Awards.
  • ARRIVAL, art direction by Patrice Vernette, set decoration by Paul Hotte
  • FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM, art direction by Stuart Craig, set decoration by Anna Pinnock
  • HAIL, CAESAR!, art direction by Jess Gonchor, set decoration by Nancy Haigh
  • LA LA LAND, art direction by David Wasco, set decoration by Sandy Reynolds-Wasco
  • PASSENGERS, art direction by Guy Hendrix Dyas, set decoration by Gene Serdena
WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND.
WHO SHOULD WIN: LA LA LAND!  I mean, did you see those color schemes?  Just freaking beautiful.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: In terms of what really stands out, ARRIVAL really only has the spaceships, which have a cool and unique look, and without more momentum, it doesn't have a chance.  PASSENGERS just has a really typical clean, white plastic future look that feels very standard.  FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM has a great production design, but not in a way that differentiates itself too much from what we've seen in the Harry Potter series.  HAIL, CAESAR!, the Coen Brothers' idiosyncratic showbiz comedy from last February got its sole nomination in this category, but more than anything, this nomination is the best nod of recognition the Academy can muster to this movie released so early in the previous year.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: SILENCE, THE NICE GUYS, maybe NOCTURNAL ANIMALS even though I hated it as a whole, THE WITCH.  Not that anything that did got nominated should have been replaced by these movies (except for maybe PASSENGERS), but each with really great production design.
                                                                                                                                                                 Summit Entertainment


BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY 
The award given for the camerawork considered most exceptional in a film and awarded to the credited director of photography on the film.  Awarded annually since the first Academy Awards held in 1929, Emmanuel Lubezki, who is not nominated this year, has won the last three years in a row.
  • ARRIVAL, director of photography Bradford Young
  • LA LA LAND, director of photography Linus Sandgren
  • LION, director of photography Greig Fraser
  • MOONLIGHT, director of photography James Laxton
  • SILENCE, director of photography Rodrigo Prieto
WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND.  That CinemaScope has got the Academy creaming in their jeans.
WHO SHOULD WIN: Probably LA LA LAND, a movie with a thoroughly beautiful look.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: I haven't seen LIONSILENCE received its only nomination in this category, but this is highly likely to wind up on the LA LA LAND pile.
                                                                                                                                                                   Summit Entertainment
BEST MAKEUP & HAIRSTYLING 
The award given for makeup work and hairstyling considered most exceptional in a film, awarded annually as a competitive award since the 54th Academy Awards held in 1982, and previously awarded intermittently as an honorary award.  The record for most wins in this category is Rick Baker with 7, who most recently won for the 2010 film THE WOLFMAN.
  • A MAN CALLED OVE, Eva von Bahr and Love Larson
  • STAR TREK BEYOND, Joel Harlow and Richard Alonzo
  • SUICIDE SQUAD, Alessandro Bertolazzi, Giorgio Gregorini and Christopher Nelson
WHO WILL WIN: STAR TREK BEYOND.
WHO SHOULD WIN: Um, STAR TREK BEYOND seems fine to me, what with the typical alien makeup designs and such, but there's nothing remarkable in any of the nominees.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: Some years, there's an abundance of great makeup and hairstyling choices from a variety of historical and fantastical films to pick from, and some years, it's a struggle to justify the category.  In this case, it's the latter.  I haven't seen A MAN CALLED OVE, and to be honest, it probably has about as good a shot as STAR TREK BEYOND, except that I can't tell from the poster and synopsis why it garnered a nomination.  I just can't abide the thought of SUICIDE SQUAD, a dumpster fire of a movie, would be given Oscar gold.  Then again, the much-maligned 2010 remake THE WOLFMAN won in this category.  Then again, THE WOLFMAN is actually kind of fun and SUICIDE SQUAD is about as fun as diarrhea farts to the face.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: SILENCE, HAIL CEASAR!, FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM.
                                                                                                                                                                       Paramount Pictures


BEST COSTUME DESIGN 
The award given for costume designs considered most exceptional in a film and awarded annually since the 21st Academy Awards held in 1949.  The record for most wins in this category is the late Edith Head with 8, who last won for THE STING at the 46th Academy Awards held in 1974, and who was the visual inspiration for the character of 'Edna Mode' in the 2004 animated film THE INCREDIBLES
  • ALLIED, costume design by Joanna Johnston
  • FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM, costume design by Colleen Atwood
  • FLORENCE FOSTER JENKINS, costume design by Consolata Boyle
  • JACKIE, costume design by Madeline Fontaine
  • LA LA LAND, costume design by Mary Zophres
WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND.
WHO SHOULD WIN: Either LA LA LAND or FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM.
WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOMINATED: You know what movie was really underrated?  THE LEGEND OF TARZAN.  That could have justified a nomination in Best Costume Design.
                                                                                                                                                                   Summit Entertainment


BEST FILM EDITING 
The award given for the assembling, transitions, pacing, coherence and other qualities related to the film editing process considered most exceptional in a film.  Due the widely agreed upon integral nature of the quality of the editing to the quality of the overall film, as with the award for Best Director, this category is closely correlated with the award for Best Picture.
  • ARRIVAL, edited by Joe Walker
  • HACKSAW RIDGE, edited by John Gilbert
  • HELL OR HIGHWATER, edited by Jake Roberts
  • LA LA LAND, edited by Tom Cross
  • MOONLIGHT, edited by Nat Sanders & Joi McMillon
WHO WILL WIN: LA LA LAND.  MOONLIGHT also has a good shot, but I'm predicting LA LA LAND.
WHO SHOULD WIN: LA LA LAND or ARRIVAL.
                                                                                                                                                                  Summit Entertainment


BEST VISUAL EFFECTS 
The award given for the most exceptional achievement in visual effects work for a film, awarded intermittently since the first Academy Awards in 1929 as a special award, as an occasionally competitive award from 1978 through 1990, and annually since 1992.
  • DEEPWATER HORIZON, visual effects work supervised by Craig Hemmeck, Jason Snell, Jason Billington and Burt Dalton
  • DOCTOR STRANGE, visual effects work supervised by Stephane Ceretti, Richard Bluff, Vincent Cirelli and Paul Corbould
  • THE JUNGLE BOOK, visual effects work supervised by Robert Legato, Adam Valdez, Andrew R. Jones and Dan Lemmon
  • KUBO AND THE TWO STRINGS, visual effects work supervised by Steve Emerson, Oliver Jones, Brian McLean and Brad Schiff
  • ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY, visual effects work supervised by John Knoll, Mohen Leo, Hal Hickel and Neil Corbould
WHO WILL WIN: THE JUNGLE BOOK
WHO SHOULD WIN: THE JUNGLE BOOK, for its AVATAR-level CGI environments and characters interacting with a live actor.
FURTHER ANALYSIS: KUBO AND THE TWO STRINGS is one of only two animated films to be nominated in this category, and it's a little odd because animated films are inherently visual effects as a whole.  The last animated film to nominated for Best Visual Effects was another stop-motion animated feature, THE NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS.
                                                                                                                                                                     Walt Disney Pictures






















OTHER AWARDS THAT ARE SORT OF IMPORTANT BUT MOSTLY JUST TO THE PEOPLE NOMINATED FOR THEM AND I'M ONLY PREDICTING THEM FOR THE SAKE OF COMPLETION

BEST DOCUMENTARY - FEATURE 
Okay, this one is actually fairly significant, but I don't see a lot of documentaries. 
  • FIRE AT SEA
  • I AM NOT YOUR NEGRO
  • LIFE, ANIMATED
  • O.J.: MADE IN AMERICA
  • 13TH
The nearly 8-hour ESPN documentary miniseries O.J.: MADE IN AMERICA was made for television but had a brief limited theatrical run before airing which qualifies it for the awards.  It's expected to win.  I haven't seen it but, it's my prediction for Best Documentary feature.  I do want to watch it eventually.  Of these nominees, the only one I have seen is 13TH, directed by Ava DuVernay, who made the excellent 2014 Martin Luther King Jr. biopic SELMA, and it was compelling, frustrating, upsetting and disturbing.
PREDICTION: O.J.: MADE IN AMERICA

BEST DOCUMENTARY - SHORT SUBJECT 
  • EXTREMIS
  • 4.1 MILES
  • JOE'S VIOLIN
  • WATANI: MY HOMELAND
  • THE WHITE HELMETS
The award for Best Documentary Short is always the most difficult category to make any sort of educated guess on for me, and probably for a lot of people, unless you're a total documentary-head.  The best you can do is guess by subject matter, and JOE'S VIOLIN is an apparently feel-good story about a Holocaust survivor donating his antique violin to a 12-year-old girl and how that changes both of their lives, and that sound like absolute Bonertown for the Academy, however, three nominees, 4.1 MILES, WATANI: MY HOMELAND and THE WHITE HELMETS deal with the incredibly topical Syrian Civil War and the former two deal specifically with Syrian refugees.  I haven't seen any of them, but I'm going to guess WATANI: MY HOMELAND.
PREDICTION: WATANI MY HOMELAND 

BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM 
  • ENNEMIS INTERIEURS
  • LA FEMME ET LE TGV
  • SILENT NIGHTS
  • SING
  • TIMECODE
I haven't seen any of these, and probably would have heard of them if they weren't nominated for Oscars.  Other people are predicting ENNEMIS INTERIEURS (Enemies Within), a 27-minute French film about an interrogation of a man accused of socializing with terrorists.  I'm just going to copy them.
PREDICTION: ENNEMIS INTERIEURS

BEST ANIMATED SHORT FILM 
  • BLIND VAYSHA
  • BORROWED TIME
  • PEAR CIDER AND CIGARETTES
  • PEARL
  • PIPER
I've actually seen two of these.  BORROWED TIME is a 7-minute computer-animated short written and directed by a pair of Pixar animators (made independently of Pixar) about a weathered Old West sheriff remembering a terrible mistake from his past.  It's kind of cool, dark and violent and very atmospheric, but also lacking in substance.  It feels more like an exercise than a story.  PIPER is made by Pixar itself, the short that played before FINDING DORY about a little sandpiper bird overcoming a fear of water.  PIPER is likely the most widely seen of the nominees, and it's cute and looks great, so it'll probably win.
PREDICTION: PIPER 

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM 
Okay, this one is actually fairly significant too. 
  • LAND OF MINE  (Denmark) 
  • A MAN CALLED OVE  (Sweden) 
  • THE SALESMAN  (Iran) 
  • TANNA  (Australia) 
  • TONI ERDMANN  (Germany) 
I haven't seen any of these.  LAND OF MINE is about German POWs forced to clear landmines in Denmark after World War II which sound fascinating and I'd like to see it.  A MAN CALLED OVE is the only nominee in this category with another nomination, that being for Best Makeup and Hairstyling.  TONI ERDMANN has highly acclaimed and has an American remake on the way starring Jack Nicholson.  THE SALESMAN, however, has gotten a big boost from the development that President Trump's Muslim ban prevents its director Asghar Farhadi from attending the ceremony.  I'm betting on THE SALESMAN.
PREDICTION: THE SALESMAN 

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

What THE FLY Taught Me About Women's Right to Choose


David Cronenberg's 1986 remake of THE FLY is frequently cited as one of the best movie remakes ever.  The original is a good and cheesy '50s bug horror movie that ends on a surprisingly poignant note, but the Cronenberg cranks everything about that to a delightfully disgusting and seriously heart-wrenching 11.  Honestly, this movie has one of the most devastating endings ever, and it's bombastic in a way that is just on the brink of being unintentionally funny, but then is not.  It's just brutal.  People mostly remember it for its Academy Award-winning makeup utilized in creating the nauseatingly gruesome transformation of brilliant scientist Seth Brundle (Jeff Goldblum) into a giant mutant housefly.  Brundle is introduced as a socially inept but genius scientist-inventor who persuades a skeptical journalist named Veronica Quaife (Geena Daivs) to come back to his warehouse home/laboratory where he shows off his latest work: a pair of "telepods" that can instantaneously transfer physical matter from a pod on one side of the room to the other.  He offers her the exclusive scoop, but the telepods aren't yet ready, and still can't successfully transfer living tissue.  As their working relationship develops, he continuing to work on the machines and she recording the process for her story, Seth and Veronica begin an intimate relationship as well.  One night, while drunk, he decides to finally test the telepods with himself, but he doesn't notice the tiny housefly that has slipped into the pod with him.  While his atoms are broken down in the pod, so are the fly's, and both are reintegrated together on a molecular level when they come out the other side, but he doesn't recognize it at first.  He feels strong, healthy and powerful, and he is much stronger, with his stamina having increased exponentially.  All he wants to do is have sex and eat.  He believes the teleportation process has had a 'purifying' effect on his body, and he desperately wants Veronica to try it too, but she refuses.  Then, he starts getting himself into trouble, what with ruthlessly snapping a man's arm during an arm wrestling contest, and he develops lesions while fingernails, teeth and other body parts start to fall away.  He's losing his human empathy and reason, while the fly's primitive instincts take over, and eventually, he'll be unrecognizable as a human.
Meanwhile, Veronica is stuck with the situation of having had so much sex with the "Brundlefly" when she thought he was regular Brundle, and now she's pregnant.
In the most "Cronenbergian" scene of the movie, Veronica has a gruesome nightmare where she gives birth to a giant, human baby-sized maggot, and understandably, she makes a beeline to a doctor's office in the middle of the night to have an abortion.  Yeesh, abortion; is there a more polarizing topic than that?  Politicians and activists divide themselves up into "pro-life" and "pro-choice", because no reasonable but otherwise uninformed person is going to hear the words 'life' or 'choice' and be against either?  C'mon!  The pro-life position, or "anti-choice" as their opponents sometimes call them, is a fairly easy one to make and basically comes down to being against murdering babies.  They might as well be protesting people sodomizing puppies.  No healthy human being is in favor of sodomizing puppies, and no normal human being is in favor of murdering babies.  However, life is complicated, and situations of rape, incest, risk to the mother or, in rare cases, impregnation by Brundlefly do occur, and those are solid arguments on the the pro-choice side, or as their opponents might call them, baby murderers.  'Choice' as an issue is trickier to defend if you're not a woman who genuinely feels the need to have an abortion right now.  Practically every person is intensely in favor of their own individual right to choose for themselves, but we're all a lot stricter when it comes to the choices of others. 
Now, it may have only been a nightmare, but in a movie where a man is gradually transforming into a giant fly, there's a healthy chance that Geena Davis is carrying a horrifying giant maggot in her womb.  This is just a guess, but I suspect even most anti-abortion hardliners probably wouldn't be against this particular abortion, but we're working with metaphors here, so bear with me.
Being of the not-a-woman persuasion, I'm particularly unlikely to ever personally want an abortion myself, but that doesn't mean haven't given some thought to the issue.  It's a pain though, because if you haven't already dug yourself in with the talking points of either end of the spectrum, it's so easy to become caught in a never-ending loop of moral relativism and moral equivalences.  If it's about when life begins, I start thinking about the TV commercial for anti-bacterial Kleenex tissues where a stereotypical Himalayan monk sneezes into a tissue and is horrified to realize how many living creatures he just killed.  Technically, a fertilized egg is a form of human life in that it's comprised of multiplying cells with human DNA, but human cells multiply into a lot of things, tumors, for instance.  The difference is that these zygotes, embryos and fetuses all have the potential to develop into a viable human being.  So do sperms and eggs for that matter, and then you fall into that weird "Every Sperm is Sacred" territory.  It just goes on and on and on.
Geena Davis's character is so desperate, she calls up her skeezy ex to take her to the doctor, and the doctor is bewildered, asking why it's so urgent that she requested to seem him in the middle of the night.  "Because I don't want it in my body!  I don't want it inside my body!" she shouts between sobs.  I was watching that, and it suddenly clicked for me.  Their bodies.  Like, holy crap.  I've heard the arguments that laws restricting abortion were made by old white men trying to legislate women's bodies, but it hadn't resonated for me the same way until this moment while watching this ultra-gory monster movie.  This is about something inside and using up a woman's body, something she didn't want, maybe which she can't afford either financially, emotionally or physically, and should she be forced (mind you, not merely encouraged to but forced) to provide herself as a human life support system? 
"Should a woman be forced to provide her own body as a life support system?"
I mean, it's still a complicated issue, but even then, no matter how hard you try, you can't actually force that on anyone.  People will try to find an alternative, so that alternative needs to be safe and available.  People don't have abortions for abortions' sake; in this increasingly bizarre world, I suppose there may be an exception out there, but women don't intentionally get pregnant so that they can have an abortion.  I suppose you could say that if they can't afford to have a child then they shouldn't be having sex, but then again, if you can't afford a car accident, maybe you shouldn't be driving anywhere.  It's a cruel and vindictive argument, and a standard that most people would not hold themselves to.  If it's practical for a woman to carry a pregnancy to term and then give the child up for adoption, that's probably a more desirable option than terminating the pregnancy, but if it isn't practical, it's not right to put that all on the individual woman. 
"If you can't afford a car accident, maybe you shouldn't be driving anywhere either."
The idea of heavily discouraging the abortion option is troubling too, because there are cases where it really is the best option for a person, and they shouldn't be made to feel bad for doing what's right in their situation.  The issue of what constitutes sentient human life between gametes, zygotes, embryos and fetuses is still a frustrating one, and while it would open a whole new massive and absurd can of ethical worms, if fetuses not viable outside the uterus could be sustained in an artificial womb, maybe that would be more desirable (that's a huge-ass 'maybe', I recognize the risibility of this hypothetical).  As long as it's entirely reliant on the woman's body, though, it has to come down to the individual woman.  When a person is being kept clinically alive by a life support system, we trust the family or whoever to determine whether or not to maintain life support, and heaven knows where the line between life and death in regards to a beating heart and an inactive brain.  A healthy pregnancy that a woman may feel the need to terminate is different, admittedly, in that a continued course will naturally lead to viable life, but a woman should probably be allowed to decide whether her body will be used as a life support system at whichever time.  But I'm only talking about abortions in respect to otherwise healthy pregnancies.  In cases of pregnancies that risk the life to the mother, I'm all for it and trying again another time.  For now, people who claim to be "pro-life" should be in favor of responsibly caring for life throughout its course and not only in its creation, and the falsehoods and blatant manipulations will only hurt their cause in the long run.  Anyway, that's what I took away from THE FLY.
THE FLY 
(HORROR/SCI-FI, 1986)
Directed by David Cronenberg
Written by Charles Edward Pogue & David Cronenberg
Starring: Jeff Goldblum, Geena Davis, John Getz, Joy Boushel, Leslie Carlson, George Chuvalo, Mike Copeman, David Cronenberg, Carol Lazare, Shawn Hewitt
Rated R for unspecified reasons (disturbing violent content and gore, sexuality and language).
96 minutes

Saturday, January 21, 2017

About That Twist: A SPLIT Review Addendum **SPOILERS**

There are some well-hidden revelations in M. Night Shyamalan's new film SPLIT that warrant discussing within the film as a whole, but if you haven't yet seen the movie, please be warned this post contains major, big-ass "spoilers" that won't necessarily ruin the experience of the movie for most viewers, but going in blank is an important aspect of the movie-going experience for some people, and what's more, this twist is pretty fun.  You have been warned.








The last scene of the SPLIT, not quite a post-credits "stinger", but which immediately follows an ending title card, reveals that the movie takes place in the same fictional universe as Shyamalan's 17-year-old fan-favorite UNBREAKABLE, and is in fact a sort of "quasi-sequel."  As patrons in a bar watch the news report of the kidnapping of three high school girls by Kevin Crumb, a man with dissociative identity disorder that manifests as 24 distinct personalities including a superhuman, cannibalistic one called "The Beast", and taken together referred to in the news report as "The Horde", some of the patrons remark on the similarity of the case of one from 15 years ago involving a man in a wheelchair, but they can't remember his name.  The theme from UNBREAKABLE plays on the soundtrack, and although I admit that I didn't spot it right away, I knew it was from an older Shyamalan movie, but once they mention the "man in a wheelchair," I caught on.  Bruce Willis, at the end of the bar, leans forward, wearing a security guard uniform labeled "Dunn," (David Dunn) just in case there was any doubt, and answers that the man's name was "Mr. Glass."
People have been asking Shyamalan to make a sequel to UNBREAKABLE for years, noting that the original thriller that followed up Shyamalan's break-out hit THE SIXTH SENSE was a superhero movie before superhero movies had become popular.  Superman and Batman had had their moments of box office success of course, but the Superman film series had been dead in the water for 13 years and an attempt to bring it back with Tim Burton in the '90s had ended in expensive failure, and the Batman series had ground to a halt shortly after the poisonous fan and critic response to 1997's BATMAN & ROBIN.  Sam Raimi's SPIDER-MAN was still two years away, and Marvel Studios wouldn't begin independently producing their own movies for the "Marvel Cinematic Universe" until 8 years later.  The superhero genre was dormant, and UNBREAKABLE was marketed as a psychological thriller to capitalize on the runaway success of THE SIXTH SENSE a year earlier.  But UNBREAKABLE doesn't feel much like a superhero movie anyway.  It has a somber tone similar to other Shyamalan movies, and it approaches superheroes in a meta, sort-of grounded way.  David Dunn is, by all appearances, physically invincible to any means except for drowning, but there's some suggestion that there's a bit of magical thinking his improbable survival of deadly accidents, and when his son nearly shoots him with a gun to prove David is indestructible, the scene is tense and ends with David talking his son down from pulling the trigger, rather than going for the wonder and awe of a bullet bouncing of the hero, Superman-style.  We never find out is David would survive a point blank gunshot.  We know he can survive a horrific train wreck, though.  David also never lifts a car over his head or gets thrown through a building, but he bench presses 350 lbs. and rips a car door off of its hinges, despite having the appearance of an ordinary man.  He initially mistakes his extrasensory abilities to read people's ill intentions as mere hunches.
UNBREAKABLE is good, but more importantly, it's unique in a way that has made it stand out and develop a strong cult following.  I first saw it on TV when I was 14 or 15, and I hadn't heard of it before then that I remember.  I remember THE SIXTH SENSE opening in theaters and people talking about it in 1999.  I remember everyone talking about SIGNS in 2002.  UNBREAKABLE just passed by.  It wasn't a box office failure, grossing a solid $248 million worldwide against a $75 million budget, but it wasn't on the level of THE SIXTH SENSE's $672 million gross or SIGNS's $408 million.  Reviews were positive, but less enthusiastic than with THE SIXTH SENSE or SIGNS.  But now, it's probably Shyamalan's most highly regarded movie, surpassing THE SIXTH SENSE in popularity (if not familiarity), and it frequently appears on lists of the best superhero movies.  Frankly, it's overrated.  It's good, but it's greatest strength is that it's conceptually interesting, and it has the same narrative and tonal clumsiness as Shyamalan's more successful movies.
What's really great about SPLIT turning out to be connected to UNBREAKABLE though is how the reveal ties together what are otherwise some very strange loose ends.  Even (or often) when he doesn't realize it, Shyamalan is not above being ridiculous, so sometimes it seems like SPLIT's portrayal of DID is symptomatic of a typical Shyamalan leap of logic, that the mind is so powerful that it can physically transform the body.  It would be one thing if The Beast personality took over and made Kevin behave like a cannibalistic wild man and that would be that, but blue veins also bulge all over his body, he grows taller, is able to bend iron bars and scale walls with his bare hands.  We're not talking a full-blown Hulk-out, but it's something similar that could exist in the established UNBREAKABLE world of restrained superpowers.  Without the final scene, SPLIT is a rough and rowdy little thriller that jumps the shark from improbable territory to unreasonably supernatural.  In some ways, the last scene reveal may be pandering for an audience's amused recognition with which comes temporary good will like a lazy cameo, or it may be a tacked-on and unearned justification, but it works better than that.  There is a pleasant sensation of recognition, but it's also really cool how that combines with something that elevates the themes and events of the plot that just played out.

Review: SPLIT

SPLIT
(THRILLER) 

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan
Starring: James McAvoy, Anya Taylor-Joy, Betty Buckley, Haley Lu Richardson, Jessica Sula, Izzie Leigh Coffey, Brad William Henke, Sebastian Arcelus, Neal Huff, Kim Director
Rated PG-13 for disturbing thematic material and behavior, violence and some language.
117 minutes
Verdict: Shyamalan's latest is at least as flawed as his best movies, but it's also fun, funny, clever and ends with one hell of a mic drop to make for his strongest movie in years.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN SPLIT IF YOU LIKED:
THE VISIT  (2015)
10 CLOVERFIELD LANE  (2016)
DEVIL  (2010)
UNBREAKABLE  (2000)
MORGAN  (2016)
I still haven't seen THE VISIT, but it seems that most people agree that it was a substantial improvement on filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan's more recent howlers like AFTER EARTH and THE LAST AIRBENDER.  A lot of people see THE VILLAGE, which I actually think is fine with some prominent strengths, as his turning point from the promising writer-director of THE SIXTH SENSE to becoming a much-loathed one trick pony, but even between THE SIXTH SENSE, UNBREAKABLE and SIGNS, even his best movies have big problems.  LADY IN THE WATER was the worst one, at least, maybe about on par with THE LAST AIRBENDER.  He has a juvenile, somewhat schlocky style, but also an occasionally overwhelming sense of self-importance.  In SPLIT, however, with a low budget of $10 million (still double that of THE VISIT, but only a quarter the cost of THE SIXTH SENSE), Shyamalan embraces the schlock and plays well to his strengths in a weird, imperfect and exploitatively fun thriller.  Are we seeing the Shyamalanaissance?
SPLIT showcases a knockout performance by James McAvoy as "Kevin", a man with an exaggerated form of dissociative identity disorder that manifests in 23 different distinct personalities that battle for prominence in "the light".  Usually the most sensible of his personalities, "Barry", maintains control, but recently, three others have taken over; the orderly and harsh "Dennis", the supposedly sweet but cruel "Patricia", and the innocent "9-year-old" boy "Hedwig," who kidnap three high school girls (Anya Taylor-Johnson of THE WITCH, Haley Lu Richardson and Jessica Sula) as sacrifices to a previously unrevealed personality they call "The Beast."
Far and away the highlight of the movie is McAvoy, who goes all in with each of his many characters, frequently alternating between and combining menace and humor.  Occasionally, Hedwig feels like a little too much, like a cartoonish representation of a mentally handicapped person, but he also has a great dance sequence, and in a turtleneck sweater, pendant and skirt, McAvoy makes Patricia hilariously weird with a bit of formality and a bit of sass.  One of the weaker points of the movie is a subplot involving Kevin's psychiatrist, Dr. Fletcher (Betty Buckley), who gives a lot of Shyamalan-style exposition about dissociative identity disorder (a highly fictionalized version of it anyway), and there are aspects of the plot that play pretty clumsily until some very late developments tie them together with unexpected and exciting efficiency, if in a slightly questionable way.  I can't say any more about it here than that.
It starts to feel long around the third act, and at two hours, it might play better if it were about 20 minutes shorter.  On the other hand, most of the movie moves along really well, with the action kicking off very early on and then leading from one doomed escape attempt after another as the girls try to manipulate the naive but not altogether innocent Hedwig.  Suffice it to say, that while it may not be perfect, SPLIT is undeniably fun and unexpectedly funny, and easily Shyamalan's best new movie in over a decade.
Images via Universal

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Review: ROGUE ONE

ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY
(ACTION-ADVENTURE/FANTASY) 
★★★
Directed by Gareth Edwards
Starring: Felicity Jones, Diego Luna, Alan Tudyk, Donnie Yen, Wen Jiang, Ben Mendelsohn, Forest Whitaker, Riz Ahmed, Mads Mikkelsen, Jimmy Smits, Alistair Petrie, Genevieve O'Reilly, Ben Daniels
Rated PG-13 for extended sequences of sci-fi violence and action.
133 minutes
Verdict: The first one-off of the Star Wars franchise is a mostly good mixed bag, but its final scenes are a treasure trove of pure "HOLY S-H-*-T" awesomeness.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY IF YOU ENJOYED:
STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS  (2015)
STAR WARS: EPISODE III - REVENGE OF THE SITH  (2005)
STAR WARS  (1977)
THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK  (1980)
RETURN OF THE JEDI  (1983)

Something miraculous happened during the last 10 or 15 minutes of ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY before the end credits.  You know how when you were a kid, there were some things that could make you unreasonably excited, pulsating uncontrollable energy, whether it was Christmas morning, a birthday or maybe going to the latest installment of your favorite movie series opening in theaters?  But now, as an adult, even at your happiest, you can almost never reattain that super-charge of shallow but intense excitement about things?  I got a taste of that exhilaration during the last 10 to 15 minutes of ROGUE ONE.  I mean, we're talking orgasmic, heart-racing, brain-blanking, pure unadulterated joy.  The rest of the movie is kind of a mixed bag.  Mostly on the positive side of things, but a few more misses than you really want.
ROGUE ONE is the first in what Lucasfilm was originally calling the Star Wars Anthology series, and which are now called Star Wars Stories, differentiated from the main thread of the saga that has chronicled the adventures of the Skywalker family, usually labeled as "Episodes" in their titles.  ROGUE ONE is a one-off, and doesn't begin with the iconic fanfare and equally iconic opening crawl.  The original STAR WARS, released in 1977 and alternately titled STAR WARS: EPISODE IV - A NEW HOPE (the best installment in the series by far, and don't let any self-serious fanboy/fangirl tell you differently), centered around stolen blueprint plans for the planet-destroying super-weapon the Death Star which Princess Leia hid inside R2-D2 to protect them from the sinister agents of the Empire in pursuit.  ROGUE ONE is about the characters who stole those plans to give to Leia and takes place just prior to the events of the original film.
Without getting into specifics (because everyone throws a big hissy fit about that), ROGUE ONE takes place about 18 years after the fall of the Republic in REVENGE OF THE SITH, with the fledgling Rebel Alliance struggling to attain a foothold in resisting the Galactic Empire, which has consolidated power.  A young woman named Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones) is recruited by the Rebellion in order to help them find her father, Galen (Mads Mikkelsen), the brilliant engineer who helped design the Death Star, which is nearing the completion of its construction under the grasping ambitions of Director Krennic (Ben Mendelsohn), and who may have sent a transmission to anti-Empire insurgents about a potential weakness in the weapon.  Among the team that comes together to help Jyn is the morally conflicted spy Captain Cassian Andor (Diego Luna), the blind monk-like warrior Chirrut ÃŽmwe (Donnie Yen) and his assassin comrade Baze Malbus (Jiang Wen), a reprogrammed former Imperial droid called K-2SO (Alan Tudyk), and an Imperial defector named Bohdi Rook (Riz Ahmed).
Written by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy, the story is a bit loosely strung together at times, and while the mirroring of events in previously existing Star Wars films (something THE FORCE AWAKENS took to an extreme by practically remaking A NEW HOPE) is fine, there are a number of less than subtle, groan-worthy callbacks for fans to squeal at with joyful recognition.  I'm sure it's different for everyone, but as I noted with THE FORCE AWAKENS a year ago, Star Wars movies are tricky because of the unique familiarity that I feel with the movies I grew up with, even the divisive prequel trilogy.  THE FORCE AWAKENS initially felt unfamiliar and it took me a couple of viewing to warm up to it, to where it's flaws are still there and they bug me, but not as much.  It's entirely watchable in a way that few movies are.  But a tremendous weakness of THE FORCE AWAKENS is how safely it plays things, while ROGUE ONE risks instability at times by trying new things.  Rather than sticking to the pure, idealistic Rebellion of the original trilogy, the movie wades into slightly murkier waters of wartime espionage, radical insurgent factions and the darker activities of a cause.  There are also stylistic choices in the designs that may or may not eventually feel expected but are a little jarring at at first, and I occasionally had difficulty keeping up with the names of places and people, which usually isn't a problem for me.  But another thing about Star Wars is that for anyone with an already existing emotional investment in the series, each new movie can be like watching an adaptation of a familiar book and the changes to your mental image of things (certain deleted concepts from previous installments visually realized in this film) may be off-putting, at least at first.
Directed by Gareth Edwards, who got the job after directing the 2014 reboot of GODZILLA, there's a good sense of scale and scope to action, especially when foot soldiers are caught in a battle with the famous Imperial AT-AT "walkers".  The context of rumored production troubles resulting in re-shoots are unclear, although the movie does have some occasionally wonky pacing and character motivations, particularly with Forest Whitaker's Clone Wars veteran Saw Gerrera, who has ties to Jyn and her father, and the first half of the film.  These could be related or for other reasons entirely, and more importantly, the movie as a whole holds together.  Some of the characters are more fun or interesting than others, and unfortunately, neither of the two leads in Jyn or Cassian meet the potential they're set up for, as if certain details were set up with their corresponding payoffs removed.  Tudyk's K-2SO is funny, sort of a mix between C-3PO, Chewbacca and Drax from GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY, with a habit of speaking without a filter, and I really liked Donnie Yen as the Force-sensitive mystic.  As someone who appreciates the prequels, it's also nice to see some connective tissue in bringing back Jimmy Smits as Senator Bail Organa and Genevieve O'Reilly as Senator Mon Mothma, both Rebellion figureheads.  At least a few human characters appear as CGI creations to no doubt expensive but varied effect, although it's hard to tell with such things whether the visual effect is noticeable because you're looking for it, but there are a couple of very impressive shots using the technology.
But it's at the end, full of stuff that I can't tell you about, that suddenly won the whole movie for me.  I mean, I guess its all stuff that would be expected, and it's fan service, sure, but holy freaking crap, I had forgotten what it was like for a movie to hit me with so much adrenaline.
                                                                                                                                                                    Images via Lucasfilm

Monday, December 12, 2016

A Holladay's Sampler of Best Bad Movies for the Holidays

There's something special about a wonderfully terrible Christmas movie.  I don't mean any old bad Christmas movie.  I mean those special ones that are magically creepy and/or stupid.  Some people ask why you'd want to watch a bad movie.  I ask, how can you not appreciate certain happy little accidents?  I'm not talking about movies that happen to be ineptly made or made on the super-cheap.  These are movies that either in a spirit of true festive sincerity or the reasonable expectation of financial returns on seasonal entertainment went forth, indulged in the sentimentality and mania of the holidays, and through a balanced blend of good intentions and dumb luck created a holiday misfire to enjoy for years to come.  It's not just that they're unintentionally funny either, although they are.  They're palatable in an idiotic way, like watching someone else's family get-together go horribly wrong but without the eventual hurt feelings and possible violence.

                                                                                                                DreamWorks
SURVIVING CHRISTMAS  (COMEDY, 2004)
Directed by Mike Mitchell
Starring: Ben Affleck, James Gandolfini, Christina Applegate, Catherine O'Hara, Josh Zuckerman, Bill Macy, Jennifer Morrison, Udo Kier, David Selby, Stephanie Faracy, Stephen Root, Sy Richardson
Rated PG-13 for sexual content, language and a brief drug reference.
91 minutes
SURVIVING CHRISTMAS is amazing and one of my favorite terrible Christmas movies.  It was released in October 2004 and quickly dumped onto DVD two months later before Christmas, because at the height of anti-Affleck sentiment, people didn't realize the twisted holiday antics they were missing.  It begins with a montage of random people committing suicide in the midst of festivities, including an elderly woman making gingerbread men who turns her gas oven on and sticking her head in while "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" blares.  It's a great start, but then we're introduced to Ben Affleck's Drew Latham, a decidedly unhinged and excessively wealthy advertising exec who horrifies his girlfriend with tickets for a Christmas trip to Fiji instead of wanting to spend time with his family, so she dumps him.  Panicked at the thought of spending Christmas alone, but not close to anyone, Drew counsels his therapist, who tells him to write down his "grievances" and symbolically burn them in front of his childhood home.  Ya know, stand in front of a stranger's house and burn stuff.  The house belongs to Tom Valco (James Gandolfini) and his family, so Tom whacks crazy Drew in the head with a snow shovel and drags his unconscious body into the house to decide what to do with him.  When Drew wakes up, he persuades the Valcos to play as his own family over the holidays for the right exorbitant sum of money, but the charade tries the family's patience as Drew is freaking nuts and has a number of Hallmark card-inspired Christmas traditions he's intent on experiencing.  The youngest Valco, Brian (Josh Zuckerman), is addicted to internet pornography, Mrs. Valco, Christine (Catherine O'Hara), is depressed and she and Tom are considering a divorce, and when the oldest of the Valco brood, Alicia (Christina Applegate) comes home, Drew can't decide whether he's in love with her or annoyed with her for fouling up his perfect Christmas plans.  Drew tries to get the family to follow a script, signs them to an official contract with his lawyer and hires a local actor to play his grandpa "Doo-Dah."  But when the old girlfriend hears that Drew is with his "family" for Christmas, she decides to pay a visit that puts everyone's roleplaying skills to the test, and with the Doo-Dah actor putting the moves on Christine and Drew clearly infatuated with Alicia, the mistaken incest jokes start to fly at an alarming rate.
                                                                                                                        DreamWorks
SURVIVING CHRISTMAS Highlights!
  • The Christmas-themed suicides montage opening credits sequence.
  • Porn-addicted son Brian and his fake "Doo-Dah" (Bill Macy) bond while web surfing for "Middle Aged Hotties", only to discover a graphic photo of Brian's mom (whether it's a Photoshop job or actual is left open-ended) just as the family and friends walks in to see as well.  Merry Christmas!
  • In the final scene before the credits roll, Drew's ex-girlfriend Missy and her parents drive past to see Drew and his supposed sister Alicia making out, which Missy's father justifies with, "'Tis the season to be jolly, honey."

                                                                                                 Warner Brothers
JACK FROST  (FAMILY/FANTASY, 1998)
Directed by Troy Miller
Starring: Michael Keaton, Kelly Preston, Joseph Cross, Mark Addy, Henry Rollins, Mika Boorem, Andrew Lawrence, Taylor Handley, Eli Marienthal, Will Rothaar
Rated PG for mild language.
101 minutes
A family-ish film sprinkled throughout with weirdly inappropriate jokes about snowman penises, JACK FROST is the wonderful story of a man named Jack Frost (Michael Keaton), who plays in a band called The Jack Frost Band (a fountain of originality, this script) who doesn't spend enough time with his family, a problem made considerably worse when he ditches his wife (Kelly Preston) and kid, Charlie (Joseph Cross), on Christmas and drives off a cliff.  A year later, Charlie accidentally summons Jack back from the netherworld in the body of a goddamn snowman (ah, there's your originality), and the first thing snowman Jack checks when he realizes that he's a snowman is whether he still has a penis (he does not, however, earlier in the film, the live Jack tried to put a penis on the snowman he was building with Charlie in the middle of the night ("Nose? I thought you said 'hose'!"), so to be fair, he wasn't coming completely out of left field with that one).  It then becomes clear that the reason Jack has been brought back as a snowman is in order to get his son to stop moping over the distant dad's gruesomely fatal car accident and get back to more important things, like Little League hockey.
                                                                                                                                                                Warner Brothers
JACK FROST Highlights!
  • Jack comes home in the middle of the night after touring and wakes Charlie up to build a snowman.  Charlie gives him the nose to put on and Jack tries to place it beneath the buttons.  "Dad, no!" says Charlie.  "Nose?  I thought you said 'hose!'" says Jack.
  • As Jack ditches his family for the last time before driving off a cliff, Charlie protests, "But, dad..." and Jack cuts him off.  "Butt Dad?  Did you just call me Butt Dad?  That'd make you Butt Boy.  Bye, Butt Family!"
  • While evading snowball-throwing bullies on a toboggan, snowman Jack is hit by a pair of snowballs in the chest region and pauses a moment to fondle his own snow-boobs.
  • As snowman Jack is melting, Charlie convinces the school bully, Rory, to help save him, because as Rory points out, "Snow-Dad is better than no dad."


                                                   20th Century Fox
JINGLE ALL THE WAY  (FAMILY/COMEDY, 1996)
Directed by Brian Levant
Starring: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sinbad, Phil Hartman, Rita Wilson, Robert Conrad, Martin Mull, Jake Lloyd, Jim Belushi, E.J. de la Pena
Rated PG for action violence, mild language and some thematic elements.
89 minutes
Okay, first things first, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the hulking, musclebound, chiseled, thickly Austrian-accented beefcake is playing an average upper-middle class mattress salesman/suburban dad.  That insanity alone is enough to recommend this '90s family comedy about everything to hate about the holidays, but that's not all!  No folks, there's also Phil Hartman as an ultra-smarmy "perfect dad" hitting on Schwarzenegger's wife, pre-9/11 jokes about cops being getting injured by explosive packages, Schwarzenegger punching a reindeer before getting it drunk, and Jake "The Phantom Menace" Lloyd.  Oh, and child molestation!  A memorable moment of a mistaken case of child molestation.  "I'm not a pervert!  I just was looking for a Turbo Man doll!"
                                                                                                                             20th Century Fox
JINGLE ALL THE WAY Highlights!
  • Anything with Phil Hartman in this movie is legitimately funny.
  • When Howard trips Myron with an R/C car while they're running after a woman with a Turbo Man doll and pauses to look down on him on the floor, saying "Poor baby!" before giggling and bolting away.  I still remember that from a commercial that played during a Christmas special when I was 5, and it's still freaking funny.
  • The whole "Hey little girl, how about a shiny red ball," and "I'm not a pervert! I was just looking for a Turbo Man doll!"
  • Myron pushes over a dancer dressed as a wrapped box in the "Wintertainment Parade" and shouts "Outta my way, box!"
  • Jake Lloyd and Phil Hartman's kid high-five when they see Cat in the Hat.
                                                                                                                     NBC/Universal
SANTA CLAUS IS COMIN' TO TOWN  (MUSICAL/KIDS, 1970)
Directed by Jules Bass & Arthur Rankin Jr.
Featuring the Voices of: Fred Astaire, Mickey Rooney, Keenan Wynn, Paul Frees, Robie Lester, Joan Gardner, Greg Thomas
Not Rated (G-level)
48 minutes
In spite of their perennial popularity, the Rankin/Bass holiday TV specials are not very good.  I'm sure there are some people who genuinely appreciate them for their craft and artistic merit, but the most likely source of their cultural endurance is the fact that everyone sees them as children, at which time they are slightly traumatized by the creepy characters and noxious songs, but not enough to go into catatonic shock.  The memory of this trauma later registers in adults as similar enough to nostalgia, so they introduce their own children to the specials, and the cycle starts over again.  It's a theory anyway.  There's a number of them to choose from, most if not all of them falling somewhere around a "good-bad" quality, but Santa Claus is Comin' to Town is the best-worst of the bunch.  Narrated by S.D. Kluger, a mailman with the voice of Fred Astaire, the stop-motion-animated short purports to tell the origin story of Santa Claus, in a fashion not so dissimilar from the typical superhero origin story (SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE didn't even come out for eight more years).  Kluger claims to be explaining all the questions about Santa that he sees in letters from children, but frankly, he creates as many mysteries as he answers.  The villain is a true badass though; the burgermeister, Burgermeister Meisterburger (voice of Paul Frees, perhaps best known as the Ghost Host on Walt Disney's Haunted Mansion).  When the baby who will grow up to be Santa is left on the Burgermeister's doorstep for gosh-knows-what-reason by gosh-knows-who (yeah, thanks for the info, S.D. Kluger), the man wisely spits out his food and tells his stooge to take it to the Orphan Asylum.  Like I said, a total badass.  I love this guy.  As the Burgermeister's main henchman Grimsby (also voiced by Frees) is on his way to the Orphan Asylum, the baby blows away in the wind and makes it all the way over a damn mountain before landing at the doorstep of what may be a cult.  In any case, they call themselves the "Kringles."  There are five short men with bushy white beards; Dingle Kringle, Wingle Kringle, Bingle Kringle, Tingle Kringle, and Zingle Kringle; and they're all lorded over by the significantly taller and plumper Tanta Kringle (voice of Joan Gardner).  Naturally, they're 100% cool with adopting a baby that shows up on the doorstep after a storm, even though it's redheaded baby with a name tag that says Claus (apparently they've seen a horror movie, because this is totally a horror movie scenario).  In spite of the name tag, Tanta has to make everything her own, so she names the baby "Kris" instead.  It is here that Santa, or as he's known at this point, Kris Kringle, attains his first Santa powers.  The creepy Kringles teach him to build toys (not that it matters, because later, he'll enslave his adopted family to build all the toys for him), and forest creatures such as deer and sea lions (wtf) teach him nifty tricks like jumping over rooftops and "ho ho ho"-type laughing.  Under the rule of Tanta Kringle (maybe their mom, maybe their wife?), the Kringles build toys in their isolated woodland cabin and then let them pile up outside, but when Kris grows into a big, strapping lad voiced by Mickey Rooney, he decides to take those toys over the mountain and give them to the children of Sombertown.  Unbeknownst to him though, the Burgermeister recently slipped on a toy, rolled down a flight of stairs and was diagnosed by the worst doctor ever (or maybe the best doctor ever?) with a broken funny bone, and ever since, the Big Government Nanny State has banned toys.  Tanta gives Kris a bright red suit, presumably as a prank to make him look like a freak in the overwhelming grayness of Sombertown, and sends him on his way.  Along the way, he meets a lost penguin (because why not?), and even though he acts like there's some sort of process to how he names it, he clearly pulls the name 'Topper' right out of his butt, like he's been waiting his whole life to name a penguin Topper.  Then, in one of the unintentionally, hilariously, absolutely creepy moments of "family entertainment" ever devised, Kris distributes the toys to the children of Sombertown for a price: that they sit on his lap and kiss him.  Um... barf?  Seriously, the song is alternatively titled "If You Sit on My Lap Today" (oh, Good Lord) and "Be Prepared to Pay" (omigawd), with lyrics like, "If you sit on my lap today, a kiss a toy is the price you'll pay," and "When you sit on my left knee, don't be stingy. Be prepared to pay!"  Um, hey parents!  There's a stranger in a flamboyant outfit out in the courtyard offering toys to children who will sit on his lap and kiss him!  No freaking duh, the Burgermeister declares him an outlaw (ostensibly for distributing illegal toys, but what public official wants to directly acknowledge an epidemic of whatever the hell else Kris was up to).  Escaping the clutches of the Burgermeister's guards, Kris starts to make his way back over the mountain, but this time runs into the super hardcore Winter Warlock (voice of Keenan Wynn; the character closely resembles the Ice King from Adventure Time) who captures him with uncertain intentions.  Luckily, Kris still has a leftover toy train to give to Winter, and the act of kindness melts the ice away from the old wizard's heart, and he decides to start hanging out with the Kringles, because what else is a neutered ice warlock to do?  Despite being banned from Sombertown for perfectly reasonable reasons, the Kringles won't stop making toys, and Kris has to dump them on those greedy-ass kids somehow.  Luckily, Kris has seduced a snooty school teacher named Jessica (voice of Robie Lester) with the gift of a china doll, and she gets the forest animals to take the kids' gimme lists to Kris ("So that's how he gets all the letters!"), and Winter shows him how to spy on children with a magic snowball.  Eventually, Kris is arrested, along with the Kringle cult, Winter and the penguin, and the Burgermeister throws them all in the dungeon, leading Jessica to have a bizarrely sincere, hair-down-hippie musical soliloquy (it always made me feel uncomfortable as a child).  Luckily, despite being behind bars, Winter still has a pocketful of magic corn that makes reindeer fly, which gives Jessica an idea.  Despite, again, those damn iron bars that Kris, the Kringles, the impotent wizard and a penguin are confined by, flying reindeer are the exact solution they need to get out of the dungeons, because apparently flying reindeer render prison walls and bars non-existent or something.  Either way, they make their escape, and Kris grows a great big, bushy beard and changes his name to Claus (no explanation about the 'Santa' part) to evade the law, marries Jessica (a sham, if you ask me) and moves to the North Pole.  That's how S.D. Kluger tells it anyway.
                                                                                                                                                                       NBC/Universal





















SANTA CLAUS IS COMIN' TO TOWN Highlights
  • "Wiggle my ears and tickle my toes, methinks I see a baby's nose! It's more than a nose. There's a whole baby attached to it. Better call my brothers. Wingle! Bingle! Tingle! Zingle!"  "What is it Dingle?"  "It's a baby, Zingle."  "A baby what, Wingle?"  "A baby baby, Tingle."  "I like babies, Bingle"  "Our baby's the best baby of them all, Wingle." 
  • Everything about the Burgermeister.  Dude is a badass.

Thursday, December 8, 2016

Christmas Carols

Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol has been adapted to the film a lot.  Here's six of the most notable ones.  For another take on the story, check out my Facebook page Duckwise for the month of December 2016.

1938
A CHRISTMAS CAROL
Directed by Edwin L. Mann
Starring: Reginald Owen, Gene Lockhart, Kathleen Lockhart, Terry Kilburn, Barry MacKay, Lynne Carver, Leo G. Carroll, Lionel Braham, Ann Rutherford, Ronald Sinclair
Not Rated (G-level; mildly scary scenes).
69 minutes
As one of the first major Hollywood adaptations of A Christmas Carol in the sound era, in the "Golden Age of Hollywood", the 1938 version produced by prolific filmmaker Joseph L. Mankiewicz is one of those "classic" movies that seems to get more respect than it deserves.  On the bright side, as it comes near the front of the pack of Dickens adaptations, it doesn't follow the basic formula of scenes and word-by-word quotations that many do, so at least it's different, but it's also juvenile and bears many of the weaker traits of old-fashioned Hollywood.  It's a period film, but there's no mistaking for anything but a product of the '30s, and not in a particularly good way.  Originally intended to star Lionel Barrymore (which sounds pretty good, at least based on the fact that he well-known for playing the character on radio and played the Scrooge-like Mr. Potter in IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE), this version stars British character actor Reginald Owen (probably most familiar to audiences as the Banks' neighbor Admiral Boom in MARY POPPINS) in ridiculous hair and makeup.  Owen may be the weakest Scrooge on this list, a bland and cartoonish rendering with seriously distracting fake eyebrows.  Largely simplified and neutered of most of its darker elements, it's milquetoast with an excess of Old Hollywood varnish, including a Tiny Tim (Terry Kilburn) sporting a slick comb-over and a Fan Scrooge (Elvira Stevens) who talks like Shirley Temple.  Among some of the more interesting changes from the material (of which there aren't many, except for heavy excising of darker scenes), at the beginning of the film, Bob Cratchit (Gene Lockhart) accidentally knocks Scrooge's hat off with a snowball, prompting the old miser to fire him, a development that weighs on him over Christmas.


1951
SCROOGE  (U.S. release title: A CHRISTMAS CAROL) 
Directed by Brian Desmond Hurst
Starring: Alastair Sim, Mervyn Johns, Hermione Baddeley, Michael Hordern, Michael J. Dolan, Francis de Wolff, Brian Worth, Kathleen Harrison, Glyn Dearman, Roddy Hughes, Jack Warner, Olga Edwardes, Peter Bull
Not Rated (PG-level; some scary moments). 
86 minutes
A British production, the 1951 version, originally titled SCROOGE but released as A CHRISTMAS CAROL in the United States, is one of the film adaptations of Dickens' novel or of any Dickens novel.  It's another one that avoids too specific an adherence to the familiar prose, but instead of simplifying an already simple story, it expands upon areas of interest, especially in the area of the "Ghost of Christmas Past" section, which really packs a punch.  With the help of a script credited to Noel Langley, the cast of illustrious character actors plays out their overly familiar parts in unusually natural fashion and immediacy, more like a true adaptation rather than the knowing tributes to the well-known story that many other dramatizations of the story become.  Alastair Sim's Scrooge is cold, rudely direct and exasperated with everyone around him, smart and sympathetic, and frequently funny, and Michael Hordern has a terrific ghostly wail as Jacob Marley.  In this version, the Ghost of Christmas Past (Michael J. Dolan, an unusual male interpretation of the role which Dickens wrote as androgynous) shows Scrooge the course he took from a hopeful but poor young man to being a slick, ruthless and successful businessman, betraying the benevolence shown to him by Mr. Fezziwig (Roddy Hughes) and adopting the no-holds-barred capitalism of a new employer, Mr. Jorkin (Jack Warner), joining forces with the similarly savvy Marley and callously watching as his only friend dies as he struggles to warn Scrooge a time before to "save yourself".  Glyn Dearman is a little oversized as Tiny Tim, but not annoying, which is the biggest hurdle for anyone playing the sappy little crippled boy.  It's very handsome and authentic, turning Dickens brilliant but overplayed story fresh and engaging.

1984
A CHRISTMAS CAROL
Directed by Clive Donner
Starring: George C. Scott, Frank Finlay, David Warner, Susannah York, Angela Pleasence, Edward Woodward, Anthony Walters, Roger Rees, Caroline Langrishe, Lucy Gutteridge, Nigel Davenport, Mark Strickson, Timothy Bateson
Rated PG for unspecified reasons (some scary moments and mild language).
100 minutes
This is the other really great version of A Christmas Carol.  Perhaps it's unfair, but I'm usually dismissive of TV movies, but if it has George C. Scott in it, you have to check it out at least once, and if you watch it once, you realize how great this particular TV movie happens to be.  At first thought, Scott doesn't seem well suited to the role of Ebeneezer Scrooge, with his stalky build that clashes with the usually lean and shriveled vision of the character (not to mention he's American), but he does play cantankerous famously well.  He's also unusually boisterous, and damn it all, but you could watch George C. Scott act anything and it would be worth the time.  Like Sim's take, Scott plays Scrooge naturally, reciting well known lines of dialogue with freshness and immediacy, such as cracking up sadistically at his own "buried with a stake of holly through his heart" wit.  Although the movie is solid throughout, the scene of Marley's Ghost is masterful, and Frank Finlay is the best Marley I've ever seen.  Painted in a metallic blue, this Marley is tragic, his voice breaking during his monologue and his wails are very much in the vein of "weeping and gnashing of teeth"-style frustration.  He's ethereal enough, but never distant, and the words are rich with meaning in his delivery.  The framing is small for television, but the power of it is in the performances, and the on location production in historic Shrewbury, England, along with beautiful lighting and interesting faces add to a rich flavor.

1988
SCROOGED
Directed by Richard Donner
Starring: Bill Murray, Karen Allen, Alfre Woodard, John Forsythe, John Glover, Bobcat Goldthwait, David Johansen, Carol Kane, Robert Mitchum, Nicholas Phillips, Buddy Hackett
Rated PG-13 for unspecified reasons (thematic elements, some sensuality, language and scary images).
101 minutes
Here, we're going to take a sharp turn into retro modernization with the very weird Bill Murray starring vehicle, SCROOGED.  Written by recurring Murray collaborator Mitch Glazer and initial Saturday Night Live head writer Michael O'Donoghue, and directed by Richard Donner (fresh off of LETHAL WEAPON, arguably his best movie), perhaps the best way to describe it is 'undisciplined'.  SCROOGED is very funny on a certain level, but objectively, it's not exactly good.  It's nuts, and not in a way that comes together.  Murray plays Frank Cross, a then-modern day (1988) Scrooge of a television network executive producing a big-budget live adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" when he's visited by the grotesquely decayed corpse of his former mentor (John Forsythe, buried under excellent makeup effects) who heralds the coming of three spirits.  The Ghost of Christmas Past (David Johansen), a cigar-smoking New York cab driver, shows him the things he gave up to pursue his career, including a relationship with an old girlfriend, Claire (Karen Allen), while the Ghost of Christmas Present (Carol Kane), a sugary sweet fairy with a proclivity for violence, shows him how he mistreats his assistant Grace (Alfre Woodard), and the ghoulish Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come does his usual thing.  Meanwhile, the arrival of each of the spirits creates disaster for Frank in the middle of production while a young upstart (Brice Cummings) is gunning for his job, and an employee fired the day before, Eliot Loudermilk (Bobcat Goldthwait), is aimlessly plotting revenge.  The movie is all over the place and full of bizarre tonal shifts between manic comedy and really dark stuff, and while the sugary sweetness of the finale is precluded by a lot of mean-spirited joking around, it doesn't feel earned.  It doesn't know whether to take itself seriously or to just be an all-out farce, but it takes aim at either alternating direction with aggressive energy.  There is the strangest sequence just following the Ghost of Christmas Present segment in which Frank discovers the dead frozen body of a homeless man he met earlier underneath the streets.  I sort of get it, but it's such a dark and inappropriate turn for this kind of movie.  But Johansen and Kane are both hilarious, and even as things turn really black for Goldthwait's characters, I get a kick out of all his scenes.  Bill Murray gives him a "zerbert" on the belly.  Just beautiful.

1992 
THE MUPPET CHRISTMAS CAROL
Directed by Brian Henson
Starring: Michael Caine, Steven Mackintosh, Meredith Braun, Robin Weaver
Muppets Performed by: David Goelz, Steve Whitmire, Jerry Nelson, Frank Oz, David Rudman, Don Austen, Jessica Fox (voice only), Robert Tygner
Rated G
86 minutes
The Muppet version of A Christmas Carol was my introduction to the story and one of the most prominent Christmas movies of my childhood.  It's alright.  The first movie starring the Muppets since the death of Jim Henson in 1990, it's pretty strange in the canon of Muppet movies.  For one, the Muppets are playing roles rather than themselves, something they repeated in MUPPET TREASURE ISLAND and had done in other contexts, but weirder is that the Muppets play it largely with reverence.  It's hardly a somber film, but it's pretty faithful to the story and that becomes really questionable when the freaking Muppets start talking about death and Christianity with complete sincerity.  I mean, say what?  Muppets can die?  They can get sick and die?  They believe in God?  Is he a Muppet god?  It's just a little too weird.  The songs are pretty good, and some of them are great, although the "extended cut" (the version on the VHS release was extended, but both the extended and the theatrical are included on the DVD) contains the very Muppet-less "When Love is Gone" which drags the whole movie to a screeching halt.  Infamous (for better and worse) Disney exec Jeffrey Katzenberg cut the scene against the director's wishes, without it, the cut is obvious, and the song tied into the concluding number, "The Love We Found", plus Katzenberg was plainly wrong before when he wanted to cut "Part of Your World" from THE LITTLE MERMAID, so I get it, but when I was a kid, the song was where the movie lost my attention, and the scene still feels like a slog.  Plus, young Scrooge in that scene is really wooden.  In terms of better songs, the opening number "Scrooge", "Marley and Marley" and the Ghost of Christmas Present's song "It Feels Like Christmas" are all standouts.  "Scrooge", in particular, had a significant impact on me as a child, and I still which I could dress in black trousers, a waistcoat, gloves and a fancy-ass cape and walk around coolly with a cane while listening to my footsteps, but that's just not socially acceptable, so f*** it.

2009
A CHRISTMAS CAROL
Directed by Robert Zemeckis
Starring: Jim Carrey, Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, Robin Wright, Daryl Sabara, Bob Hoskins, Cary Elwes, Steve Valentine, Ryan Ochoa, Sammi Hanratty
Rated PG for scary sequences and images.
95 minutes
Poor Robert Zemeckis.  He spent years pushing and pioneering "motion-capture"-based animated films and digital 3D, and a month after his A CHRISTMAS CAROL, a movie with the full weight of the Disney marketing machine behind it, opened to mixed reviews and decent box office, James Cameron's mo-cap-heavy 3D extravaganza AVATAR tears into theaters to become the biggest movie of all time and becomes the heavily Oscar-nominated toast of Hollywood.  To be fair though, even with its luster soon lost after the hype died down, AVATAR is still a decent action-adventure movie, and Zemeckis' A CHRISTMAS CAROL is all kinds of messed up.  I took a date to it in my senior year of high school.  It was much more about the girl than the movie, and it was 2009, so there were no good movies, and at least this one had the novelty of being in 3D.  Within the trilogy of mo-cap productions directed by Zemeckis, A CHRISTMAS CAROL is a substantial improvement on THE POLAR EXPRESS, but not as good as BEOWULF.  Zemeckis has made some great films, masterpieces for the ages even, such as BACK TO THE FUTURE and WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT, which is improbable because his most significant trademarks as a director are a slavish devotion to pioneering innovative effects technology and nostalgia.  But the man knows what he's doing when he bothers to do it.  With A CHRISTMAS CAROL, he has a lot of the right ideas but then misfires by blowing his load wildly on every possible excess he can come up with.  For one, it's excessively grotesque, like Zemeckis is trying to mess with the Disney label by opening his movie with a smash cut to Marley's dead face.  Worse, in the middle of Marley's wonderful "mankind was my business" monologue, Zemeckis undercuts everything by turning it into a gross-out comic beat when Marley's mouth rips wide open at the cheeks, leaving his jaw dangling and forcing him to puppeteer his own mouth.  This on top of an already awful take on Marley acted by Gary Oldman, turning the tragic figure into an utterly distant and largely frozen specter.  Seriously though, this movie is going out of its way to terrorize any children who unwittingly watch it, which I'd be fine with if it wasn't so often to the detriment of the material.  Also on the list of bizarre excesses, Scrooge is inexplicably shrunk down to the size of a mouse during the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come section, complete with an accompanying high-pitch silly voice.  Why?  Um, because.  There are plenty of the wildly swooping, extended camera shots through the Victorian London streets that you can only get from this sort of totally digital domain, and they look really cool in 3D, but always excessive and only more so without the 3D effect.  The hyper-realistic animation looks pretty good, especially compared to THE POLAR EXPRESS (although still not on the level of THE ADVENTURES OF TINTIN), and the production design of a classic Dickensian London Christmas is great, though.  The music by Alan Silvestri is also very good, complete with a jubilant original song, "God Bless Us Everyone" performed by Andrea Bocelli.  In the leading role, as well as performing each of the Christmas Spirits through the wonders of motion-capture, Jim Carrey is generally good, but he's never convincing as four completely separate characters (to be fair, there is a brief acknowledgement of similarity between his laugh as Scrooge and his laugh as the Ghost of Christmas Present) and as Scrooge, his voice work sounds like a young man trying to sound old.